From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: narmstrong@baylibre.com (Neil Armstrong)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:33:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: dts: meson-axg: add RMII pins for ethernet
 controller
In-Reply-To: <2fa28259-cce9-37fc-3bcd-6017a35a052a@amlogic.com>
References: <20180111030411.197054-1-yixun.lan@amlogic.com>
 <1515659863.5048.112.camel@baylibre.com>
 <2fa28259-cce9-37fc-3bcd-6017a35a052a@amlogic.com>
Message-ID: <593cbb66-7040-b27d-5109-702fb43dc18e@baylibre.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 11/01/2018 10:11, Yixun Lan wrote:
> Hi Jerome?
> 
> On 01/11/18 16:37, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 11:04 +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
>>> Comparing to RGMII interface, the RMII interface require few pins.
>>> So it's worth describing them here.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@amlogic.com>
>>
>> The only axg platform we have upstream is the s400 and is using rgmii.
>> May I ask how this was tested ?
>>
> It's true that S400 using RGMII interface.
> 
> but, we have customer using RTL8201FR-VB/VD which is a RMII PHY,
> 
> This is actually tested with the 'eth_rmii_x_pins' group.
> 
> Yixun
> 

I pushed the same for GXBB,

Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>