From: arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com (arvindY)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/5 v4] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:31:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A12FC64.3020205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120133717.kscrjsb3y7gnvd2t@piout.net>
Hi,
On Monday 20 November 2017 07:07 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 19/11/2017 at 09:45:00 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
>> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
>> for zero is not correct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> changes in v2 :
>> irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
>> changes in v3 :
>> Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
>> changes in v4 :
>> Return -ENODEV insted of irq.
>>
> To ensure this doesn't get applied: platform_get_irq can return
> -EPROBE_DEFER and this must be handled properly.
>
> (Or maybe this has never caused anything and never failed at all and
> nobody cares).
Yes, you are right. We should retry to get an irq for device. But ASoC
driver is not retrying. if platfore_get_irq() fail here, Driver is
throwing an error.
and this patch is only to fix error checking which is not correct in
Driver.
~arvind
>
>> sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> index bbf7a92..efeecee 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
>> struct resource *res;
>> - unsigned int irq;
>> + int irq;
>> int ret;
>>
>> info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
>>
>> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> - if (!irq)
>> + if (irq <= 0)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alsa-devel mailing list
>> Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-19 4:15 [PATCH 1/5 v4] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` [PATCH 2/5 v4] ASoC: mt8173: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` [PATCH 3/5 v4] ASoC: nuc900: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` [PATCH 4/5 v3] ASoC: intel: sst: Handle return value of platform_get_irq Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` [PATCH 5/5 v3] ASoC: intel: mfld: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-20 13:37 ` [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/5 v4] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking Alexandre Belloni
2017-11-20 16:01 ` arvindY [this message]
2017-11-29 10:53 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A12FC64.3020205@gmail.com \
--to=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).