[PATCH v5 0/6] dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector

[cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi)]

Hi Andrzej, Archit,

On 2018? 03? 07? 20:13, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo, Archit,
> 
> On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2018? 03? 07? 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Hi Rob and Andrzej,
>>>
>>> On 2018? 03? 06? 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for reviews of previous iterations.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with
>>>>> working example.
>>>>> I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading
>>>>> to a happy end :)
>>>>>
>>>>> v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function.
>>>>> v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts.
>>>>> v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C
>>>>>     example.
>>>>> v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks 
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in datail are described in the patches.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Andrzej
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrzej Hajda (5):
>>>>>   dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector
>>>>>   dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector
>>>>>   arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms
>>>>>   arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector
>>>>>   extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node
>>>>>
>>>>> Maciej Purski (1):
>>>>>   drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL
>>>> It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's
>>>> acks for dts part).
>>>> Now I have a question how to merge them.
>>>> The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from
>>>> the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st.
>>>> I can merge it:
>>>> 1. All patches via drm-misc tree.
>>>> 2. All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via
>>>> samsung-soc tree.
>>>>
>>>> Is it OK, for all? Better ideas?
>>> Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on v4.16-rc1
>>> and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to Rob and Andrzej.
>>>
>>>
>> I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull request.
>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=ib-extcon-drm-dt-v4.17
>>
>> Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me.
>>
> 
> It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch.

My mistake. I picked v6 and made the new immutable branch.
After Archit confirm it, I'll send pull request.

> 
> Beside it I am OK with your immutable branch, Archit is it OK to do it
> this way in drm-misc?
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Andrzej
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics