From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:41:30 +0900 Subject: [RFC 06/10] thermal: samsung: Remove support for Exynos5440 In-Reply-To: <20180424203239.21885-7-krzk@kernel.org> References: <20180424203239.21885-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20180424203239.21885-7-krzk@kernel.org> Message-ID: <5AE12E4A.90907@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Krzysztof, On 2018? 04? 25? 05:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The Exynos5440 is not actively developed, there are no development > boards available and probably there are no real products with it. > Remove wide-tree support for Exynos5440. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 14 +- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 155 +-------------------- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 1 - > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) After applied this patch, I tested the build and found out 'exynos5440' keyword. There is one comment including 'exynos5440' as following: diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index f92f470bce21..cb525228cfe1 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct exynos_tmu_data *data) * Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and Exynos5260 incorrectly * states that INTCLEAR register has a different placing of bits * responsible for FALL IRQs than INTSTAT register. Exynos5420 - * and Exynos5440 documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't + * documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't * support FALL IRQs at all). */ writel(val_irq, data->base + tmu_intclear); After removing it, looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics