linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [regulator:for-next 103/105] drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:35:5: sparse: symbol 'ready_mask_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2019-04-15 16:52 kbuild test robot
  2019-04-15 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH regulator] regulator: ready_mask_table[] can be static kbuild test robot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2019-04-15 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pascal PAILLET-LME
  Cc: Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown,
	kbuild-all, Maxime Coquelin, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
head:   598387d3ce4bd982272a2bc990dfad6d67d20efd
commit: 6cdae8173f6771977c3863bac7f1455c96bb1f6e [103/105] regulator: Add support for stm32 power regulators
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        git checkout 6cdae8173f6771977c3863bac7f1455c96bb1f6e
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:35:5: sparse: symbol 'ready_mask_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:47:5: sparse: symbol 'stm32_pwr_reg_is_ready' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:57:5: sparse: symbol 'stm32_pwr_reg_is_enabled' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-17 16:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-15 16:52 [regulator:for-next 103/105] drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:35:5: sparse: symbol 'ready_mask_table' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2019-04-15 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH regulator] regulator: ready_mask_table[] can be static kbuild test robot
2019-04-16 15:32   ` Pascal PAILLET-LME
2019-04-17 16:42   ` Applied "regulator: ready_mask_table[] can be static" to the regulator tree Mark Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).