linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "U.Mutlu" <um@mutluit.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Oliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, FUKAUMI Naoki <naobsd@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Pablo Greco <pgreco@centosproject.org>,
	linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: ata: ahci_sunxi: Increased SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 13:20:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5CD95314.4060307@mutluit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190513095916.yyjdtueeefkf4v4b@flea>

Maxime Ripard wrote on 05/13/2019 11:59 AM:
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 10:59:54PM +0200, Uenal Mutlu wrote:
>> Increasing the SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs (P0DMACR.TXTS and .RXTS, ie.
>> TX_TRANSACTION_SIZE and RX_TRANSACTION_SIZE) from default 0x0 each
>> to 0x3 each, gives a write performance boost of 120 MiB/s to 132 MiB/s
>> from lame 36 MiB/s to 45 MiB/s previously.
>> Read performance is about 200 MiB/s.
>> [tested on SSD using dd bs=2K/4K/8K/12K/16K/24K/32K: peak-perf at 12K].
>>
>> Tested on the Banana Pi R1 (aka Lamobo R1) and Banana Pi M1 SBCs
>> with Allwinner A20 32bit-SoCs (ARMv7-a / arm-linux-gnueabihf).
>> These devices are RaspberryPi-like small devices.
>>
>> This problem of slow SATA write-speed with these small devices lasts now
>> for more than 5 years. Many commentators throughout the years wrongly
>> assumed the slow write speed was a hardware limitation. This patch finally
>> solves the problem, which in fact was just a hard-to-fix software problem
>> (b/c of lack of documentation by the SoC-maker Allwinner Technology).
>>
>> RFC: Since more than about 25 similar SBC/SoC models do use the
>> ahci_sunxi driver, users are encouraged to test it on all the
>> affected boards and give feedback.
>>
>> Lists of the affected sunxi and other boards and SoCs with SATA using
>> the ahci_sunxi driver:
>>    $ grep -i -e "^&ahci" arch/arm/boot/dts/sun*dts
>>    and http://linux-sunxi.org/SATA#Devices_with_SATA_ports
>>    See also http://linux-sunxi.org/Category:Devices_with_SATA_port
>>
>> Patch v2:
>>    - Commented the patch in-place in ahci_sunxi.c
>>    - With bs=12K and no conv=... passed to dd, the write performance
>>      rises further to 132 MiB/s
>>    - Changed MB/s to MiB/s
>>    - Posted the story behind the patch:
>>      http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1905.1/03506.html
>>    - Posted a dd test script to find optimal bs, and some results:
>>      https://bit.ly/2YoOzEM
>>
>> Patch v1:
>>    - States bs=4K for dd and a write performance of 120 MiB/s
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Uenal Mutlu <um@mutluit.com>
>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>

Thx!

> Just a minor nitpick though, the part starting with RFC: and with the
> version changelog should be after the --- below so that it doesn't get
> applied as part of the commit log.

Ok, I'll do it better in the future.
Thx again.


> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2019-05-13 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-12 20:59 [RFC PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: ata: ahci_sunxi: Increased SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs Uenal Mutlu
2019-05-13  7:44 ` Hans de Goede
2019-05-13 10:34   ` U.Mutlu
2019-05-13 11:20     ` Hans de Goede
2019-05-13  9:59 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-13 11:20   ` U.Mutlu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5CD95314.4060307@mutluit.com \
    --to=um@mutluit.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=naobsd@gmail.com \
    --cc=oliver@schinagl.nl \
    --cc=pgreco@centosproject.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).