linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: sun4i: Narrow scope of local variable
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 09:37:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5DE8C1E3.4080204@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191205072404.6858-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>



Am 05.12.2019 08:24, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> The variable pval is only used in a single block in the function
> sun4i_pwm_calculate(). So declare it in a more local scope to simplify
> the function for humans and compilers.
> 
> While the diffstat for this patch is negative for this patch I still
> thing the advantage of having a narrower scope is beneficial.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> for the patch that became
> 
> 	1b98ad3b3be9 ("pwm: sun4i: Drop redundant assignment to variable pval")
> 
> (and which yielded the situation that pval is only used in this single
> block) I suggested to do this change. This was ignored however by both
> Colin and Thierry without comment. So I suggest the change here
> separately.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index 581d23287333..8919e6ab7577 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
>  			       u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr)
>  {
>  	u64 clk_rate, div = 0;
> -	unsigned int pval, prescaler = 0;
> +	unsigned int prescaler = 0;
>  
>  	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
>  
> @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
>  	if (prescaler == 0) {
>  		/* Go up from the first divider */
>  		for (prescaler = 0; prescaler < PWM_PRESCAL_MASK; prescaler++) {
> +			unsigned int pval;
> +
>  			if (!prescaler_table[prescaler])
>  				continue;
>  			pval = prescaler_table[prescaler];


nit picking:
Doing the assignment first would remove the only use
of prescaler_table[prescaler].

unsigned int pval = prescaler_table[prescaler];
if ( ! pval )
  continue;

if you feel adventures you could also replace the for() for a while()
since we know that prescaler == 0.

while ( prescaler < PWM_PRESCAL_MASK )
{
unsigned int pval = prescaler_table[prescaler++];
....


jm2c,

 wh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-05  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02 10:08 [PATCH] pwm: sun4i: redundant assignment to variable pval Colin King
2019-10-02 10:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-12-05  7:24   ` [PATCH] pwm: sun4i: Narrow scope of local variable Uwe Kleine-König
2019-12-05  8:37     ` walter harms [this message]
2019-12-10 10:12       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-12-10 10:24         ` [PATCH v2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-02 10:39 ` [PATCH] pwm: sun4i: redundant assignment to variable pval Thierry Reding
2019-10-02 13:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-02 13:28   ` Colin Ian King
2019-10-02 13:29   ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-02 13:30     ` Colin Ian King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5DE8C1E3.4080204@bfs.de \
    --to=wharms@bfs.de \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).