From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCBFC352A2 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08B720838 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="e/iCh2Au"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="zW/nio0+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C08B720838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From: Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=AH0VTmho+rrK7YNzcUUYa7gub6w+5mhTha5OLfXcocY=; b=e/iCh2AupAZvQqy1bxi9vH5HV Lv8LNxjtZ0nf0GwinkL+rH9FsHljoQG58Kf782eAVg1Q59idMP4CtufBnSUlIeJHJa0jGV6gAQVUu cHuF1L+8eRNE5iBEczAjhrI7T+WjmrVq0B/vtMm4CKoJQvlPrJ+ebW1Tjad83mfFC2xycjTHBUVb9 gxRUeJ7+L8JsTaAXoegu06tE5BzGlKzkqQUwgbQhJJ+/W1HZLPyKZzhxg3lN6kRSZv9KnB3sdIcQD vwivQxMulAjxmfE9GTob6R2E1Qz94S07zR2FL2NjCK9HbPhcYqbHMkVDjQjo4u0IXUHAN+6uufdv4 N0fHEHxHQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j01IF-0000l4-6v; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:55:27 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j01IB-0000kN-SA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:55:25 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CD93206CC; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:55:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581072923; bh=tPs5H9AbTnDezEyZRgN1RRDSASkyAfz82Te9JoZbUx0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=zW/nio0+8GIieS4vcjuy+ovkh1Y3Bhroi6QKtaEt8EQidRYr/U6n+wMWUYKmj4q1E hjFytHuPopKqg3UVWvtDcoCtpjh5SI5rVm0ZnzDqkVH2WO3cgEciOd8hO5y04wBJeL GPetM32vdLT7c5T5ZDPIdcsbbDwG3iayll3rtcrc= Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j01I9-003Vpd-CK; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:55:21 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:55:21 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports In-Reply-To: <20200207104736.GB36345@bogus> References: <1580994086-17850-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> <1580994086-17850-2-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> <7875e2533c4ba23b8ca0a2a296699497@kernel.org> <20200207104736.GB36345@bogus> Message-ID: <5a073c37e877d23977e440de52dba6e0@kernel.org> X-Sender: maz@kernel.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: sudeep.holla@arm.com, peng.fan@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200207_025523_951198_AD1FD03D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.82 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, peng.fan@nxp.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2020-02-07 10:47, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 10:08:36AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 2020-02-06 13:01, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote: >> > From: Peng Fan >> > >> > SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports, so add into devicetree >> > binding doc. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan >> > --- >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 4 +++- >> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt >> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt >> > index f493d69e6194..03cff8b55a93 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt >> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Required properties: >> > >> > The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the >> > /firmware/ node. >> > >> > -- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" >> > +- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc" >> > - mboxes: List of phandle and mailbox channel specifiers. It should >> > contain >> > exactly one or two mailboxes, one for transmitting messages("tx") >> > and another optional for receiving the notifications("rx") if >> > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be >> > under the /firmware/ node. >> > protocol identifier for a given sub-node. >> > - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size >> > associated with it. >> > +- arm,smc-id : SMC id required when using smc transports >> > +- arm,hvc-id : HVC id required when using hvc transports >> > >> > Optional properties: >> >> Not directly related to DT: Why do we need to distinguish between SMC >> and >> HVC? > > IIUC you want just one property to get the function ID ? Does that > align > with what you are saying ? I wanted to ask the same question and I see > no need for 2 different properties. Exactly. Using SMC or HVC should come from the context, and there is zero value in having different different IDs, depending on the conduit. We *really* want SMC and HVC to behave the same way. Any attempt to make them different should just be NAKed. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel