public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
	Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Cyril Brulebois" <kibi@debian.org>,
	"Phil Elwell" <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add two optional props
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:47:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c6d0259-0fe2-4faa-5ecf-8621467533a1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab1b0161-20c2-83eb-e371-e8363547e758@linaro.org>

On 4/6/23 11:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/04/2023 18:58, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 06.04.23 um 14:46 schrieb Jim Quinlan:
>>>> Regarding "brcm,enable-l1ss":
>>>>
>>>>     The Broadcom STB/CM PCIe HW -- which is also used by RPi SOCs -- requires
>>>>     the driver probe to configure one of three clkreq# modes:
>>>>
>>>>     (a) clkreq# driven by the RC
>>>>     (b) clkreq# driven by the EP for ASPM L0s, L1
>>>>     (c) bidirectional clkreq#, as used for L1 Substates (L1SS).
>>>>
>>>>     The HW can tell the difference between (a) and (b), but does not know
>>>>     when to configure (c).  Further, the HW will cause a CPU abort on boot if
>>>>     guesses wrong regarding the need for (c).  So we introduce the boolean
>>>>     "brcm,enable-l1ss" property to indicate that (c) is desired.  This
>>>>     property is already present in the Raspian version of Linux, but the
>>>>     driver implementaion that will follow adds more details and discerns
>>>>     between (a) and (b).
>>>>
>>>> Regarding "brcm,completion-timeout-msecs"
>>>>
>>>>     Our HW will cause a CPU abort if the L1SS exit time is longer than the
>>>>     completion abort timeout.  We've been asked to make this configurable, so
>>>>     we are introducing "brcm,completion-abort-msecs".
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml       | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>>>> index 7e15aae7d69e..ef4ccc05b258 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>>>> @@ -64,6 +64,18 @@ properties:
>>>>
>>>>      aspm-no-l0s: true
>>>>
>>>> +  brcm,enable-l1ss:
>>>> +    description: Indicates that the downstream device is L1SS
>>>> +      capable and L1SS is desired, e.g. by setting
>>>> +      CONFIG_PCIEASPM_POWER_SUPERSAVE=y.  Note that CLKREQ#
>>>
>>> not sure about this, but maybe we should avoid references to Linux
>>> kernel config parameter in a DT binding. Since the driver already gaves
>>> warning in case the DT parameter is present, but kernel config doesn't
>>> fit, this should be enough.
>>
>> Hello Stefan,
>> I will remove this reference.
>>>
>>>> +      assertion to clock active must be within 400ns.
>>>> +    type: boolean
>>>> +
>>>> +  brcm,completion-timeout-msecs:
>>>> +    description: Number of msecs before completion timeout
>>>> +      abort occurs.
>>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>>
>>> According to the driver at least 0 is not allowed, maybe we should
>>> define minimum and maximum here and let dtbs_check take care of invalid
>>> values?
>> I'm not sure I follow what you mean about a zero value;  the property
>> may have any value but the driver will clamp it
>> to a minimum of ~30msec.  Regardless, I can add a  "minimum: 30" line
>> to the YAML.
> 
> If "completion" means Linux completion, then it is not suitable for DT
> and entire property should be removed. If it is something else, then
> explain here and commit msg. So far both refer to some completion...

This is a PCIe root complex binding so completion needs to be understood 
in the context of PCIe, that is the time needed for the root complex to 
complete/finish/proceed with a PCIe transaction layer packet (TLP).
-- 
Florian


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-06 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-06 12:46 [PATCH v1 0/3] PCI: brcmstb: Clkreq# accomodations of downstream device Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 12:46 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add two optional props Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 15:39   ` Stefan Wahren
2023-04-06 16:58     ` Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 18:35       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 18:47         ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2023-04-06 18:53           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 18:34   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 18:53     ` Florian Fainelli
2023-04-06 18:54       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 12:46 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] PCI: brcmstb: Clkreq# accomodations of downstream device Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 19:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-06 20:03     ` Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 12:46 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] PCI: brcmstb: Allow setting the completion timeout Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 15:59   ` Stefan Wahren
2023-04-06 17:15     ` Jim Quinlan
2023-04-06 21:31 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] PCI: brcmstb: Clkreq# accomodations of downstream device Cyril Brulebois
2023-04-07 15:06   ` Hank Barta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c6d0259-0fe2-4faa-5ecf-8621467533a1@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
    --cc=kibi@debian.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox