From: charanya@codeaurora.org (charanya at codeaurora.org)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Disable restoring Rx interrupts for DMA Mode
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 14:48:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cce36b3c1d62816feffb4048f782b20@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160512050245.GD8453@hector.attlocal.net>
On 2016-05-12 10:32, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:41:26PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 05/10, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
>> > From: Charanya <charanya@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Was it intentional to only have one name here?
>>
>> >
>> > The Data loss was happening with current QCOM MSM serial driver during
>> > large file transfer due to simultaneous enabling of both UART and
>> > DMA interrupt. When UART operates in DMA mode, RXLEV (Rx FIFO over
>> > watermark) or RXSTALE (stale interrupts) should not be enabled,
>> > since these conditions will be handled by DMA controller itself.
>> > If these interrupts are enabled then normal UART ISR will read some
>> > bytes of data from Rx Buffer and DMA controller will not receive
>> > these bytes of data, which will cause data loss.
>> >
>> > Now this patch removed the code for enabling of RXLEV and RXSTALE
>> > interrupt in DMA Rx completion routine.
>>
>> I'm lost, we keep both these irqs masked (well only if uartdm
>> version is 1.4 or greater) pretty much the entire time we're
>> using DMA for RX. msm_start_rx_dma() will mask them and then when
>> the callback completes we'll unmask them (the part that's deleted
>> in this patch), but then we'll go back and remask them almost
>> immediately because we call msm_start_rx_dma() from the dma
>> completion handler.
>>
>> Can you clearly describe how this is actually fixing any
>> problems? What's the sequence of events that happens to cause
>> corruption?
>>
>> This does raise the question though why we ever mask/unmask these
>> interrupts if we're always going to keep them masked while doing
>> DMA RX. Presumably if we can use DMA to RX, we can always use it
>> and set things up properly at startup time instead of later on.
>
> Thats probably the right thing to do. We shouldn't be
> masking/unmasking
> the unused IRQs to begin with.
Hi Stephen/Andy,
If both Tx and Rx are used simultaneously, restoring Rx interrupts in
msm_complete_rx_dma could lead to RXSTALE interrupt being triggered,
when
the ISR execution for TXLEV interrupt is completed, since msm_port->imr
is
rewritten to UART_IMR in msm_uart_irq. Hence, we do not have to restore
Rx interrupts since Rx is always in DMA mode once enabled.
Thanks.
Charanya.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-13 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-10 16:09 [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Disable restoring Rx interrupts for DMA Mode Abhishek Sahu
2016-05-12 1:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-05-12 5:02 ` Andy Gross
2016-05-13 9:18 ` charanya at codeaurora.org [this message]
2016-05-25 22:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-06-02 9:07 ` charanya at codeaurora.org
2016-06-02 18:37 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cce36b3c1d62816feffb4048f782b20@codeaurora.org \
--to=charanya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).