From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@mediatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] wifi: mt76: mt7925: fix error checking in mt7925_mcu_uni_rx/tx_ba()
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:15:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e7bc52b-332d-475e-94ca-571864cb1a6a@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063aafdf-3234-42ac-a4ea-3ff98e2835b6@stanley.mountain>
Ping.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:46:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "ret" variable in mt7925_mcu_uni_[rx/tx]_ba() needs to be signed for
> the if (ret < 0) condition to be true.
>
> Also the mt7925_mcu_sta_ba() function returns positive values on success.
> The code currently returns whatever non-negative value was returned on
> the last iteration. It would be better to return zero on success. This
> function is called from mt7925_ampdu_action() which does not check the
> return value so the return value doesn't affect runtime. However, it
> still makes sense to return zero even though nothing is affected in the
> current code.
>
> Fixes: eb2a9a12c609 ("wifi: mt76: mt7925: Update mt7925_mcu_uni_[tx,rx]_ba for MLO")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c
> index 15815ad84713..b3a00964e802 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c
> @@ -617,7 +617,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf;
> unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif);
> struct mt76_wcid *wcid;
> - u8 link_id, ret;
> + u8 link_id;
> + int ret;
>
> for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
> mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id);
> @@ -630,10 +631,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, wcid, params,
> enable, true);
> if (ret < 0)
> - break;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> @@ -647,7 +648,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf;
> unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif);
> struct mt76_wcid *wcid;
> - u8 link_id, ret;
> + u8 link_id;
> + int ret;
>
> for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
> mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id);
> @@ -657,10 +659,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, wcid, params,
> enable, false);
> if (ret < 0)
> - break;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int mt7925_load_clc(struct mt792x_dev *dev, const char *fw_name)
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-20 9:46 [PATCH next] wifi: mt76: mt7925: fix error checking in mt7925_mcu_uni_rx/tx_ba() Dan Carpenter
2025-02-18 13:15 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2025-02-19 2:15 ` Mingyen Hsieh (謝明諺)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e7bc52b-332d-475e-94ca-571864cb1a6a@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=deren.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=shayne.chen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox