From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Add support for DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC attribute to swiotlb
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:24:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f4cda9e-9f23-afe1-b191-fbed208b04d0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484129477-24121-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
On 11/01/17 10:11, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> From: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@renesas.com>
>
> This patch adds support for DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC attribute for
> dma_{un}map_{page,sg} functions family to swiotlb.
>
> DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC allows platform code to skip synchronization of
> the CPU cache for the given buffer assuming that it has been already
> transferred to 'device' domain.
>
> Ported from IOMMU .{un}map_{sg,page} ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@renesas.com>
> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> v2:
> - Add Acked-by.
>
> Support for DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC was included when porting the IOMMU
> ops from arm to arm64 in commit 13b8629f651164d7 ("arm64: Add IOMMU
> dma_ops").
>
> Presumably it was an oversight that the existing swiotlb based
> implementation didn't have support for DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC yet?
Less an oversight, more that nobody's wanted to use it until now ;)
Personally I'd prefer flag tests to be "!(x)" rather than "(x) == 0",
but the latter is already in place, so I'll leave the final word on
style/consistency nitpicks to Catalin and Will.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index e04082700bb16c35..1d7d5d2881db7c19 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ static dma_addr_t __swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> dma_addr_t dev_addr;
>
> dev_addr = swiotlb_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs);
> - if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev))
> + if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev) &&
> + (attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) == 0)
> __dma_map_area(phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dev_addr)), size, dir);
>
> return dev_addr;
> @@ -222,7 +223,8 @@ static void __swiotlb_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
> size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> unsigned long attrs)
> {
> - if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev))
> + if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev) &&
> + (attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) == 0)
> __dma_unmap_area(phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dev_addr)), size, dir);
> swiotlb_unmap_page(dev, dev_addr, size, dir, attrs);
> }
> @@ -235,7 +237,8 @@ static int __swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> int i, ret;
>
> ret = swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(dev, sgl, nelems, dir, attrs);
> - if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev))
> + if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev) &&
> + (attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) == 0)
> for_each_sg(sgl, sg, ret, i)
> __dma_map_area(phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, sg->dma_address)),
> sg->length, dir);
> @@ -251,7 +254,8 @@ static void __swiotlb_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *dev,
> struct scatterlist *sg;
> int i;
>
> - if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev))
> + if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev) &&
> + (attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) == 0)
> for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
> __dma_unmap_area(phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, sg->dma_address)),
> sg->length, dir);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-11 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 10:11 [PATCH] arm64: Add support for DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC attribute to swiotlb Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-01-11 14:24 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2017-01-12 15:35 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f4cda9e-9f23-afe1-b191-fbed208b04d0@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).