Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm63xx: remove PM_SLEEP based conditional compilation

From: "Gole, Dhruva" <d-gole@ti.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>, Vignesh <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Tanguy Bouzeloc <tanguy.bouzeloc@efixo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm63xx: remove PM_SLEEP based conditional compilation
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 22:48:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <602392dc-de1f-90bf-3deb-cb5cee81e41c@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8edb48ee-55a3-4cc2-9c81-514ec867b35c@roeck-us.net>

Hi,

On 4/25/2023 8:38 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 05:46:15PM +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote:
>> Get rid of conditional compilation based on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP because
>> it may introduce build issues with certain configs where it maybe disabled
>> This is because if above config is not enabled the suspend-resume
>> functions are never part of the code but the bcm63xx_spi_pm_ops struct
>> still inits them to non-existent suspend-resume functions.
>>
>> Fixes: b42dfed83d95 ("spi: add Broadcom BCM63xx SPI controller driver")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> This patch results in:
>
> drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c:632:12: error: 'bcm63xx_spi_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>   632 | static int bcm63xx_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
>       |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c:620:12: error: 'bcm63xx_spi_suspend' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>   620 | static int bcm63xx_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
> on architectures with no PM support (alpha, csky, m68k, openrisc, parisc,
> riscv, s390).

Thanks for pointing this out.

I could send a patch to address this as pointed here [0]

by adding a __maybe_unused.

However, do you think my other patch [1] could address this issue without the need for above?

I think it would because DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS doesn't seem to be under any conditional CONFIG_PM.

However, I may have missed something, please do let me know what's the best way to fix.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/24ec3728-9720-ae6a-9ff5-3e2e13a96f76@gmail.com/

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230424102546.1604484-1-d-gole@ti.com/

>
> Guenter

-- 
Regards,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel