From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:06:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6043487.0U6pzGhZid@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370272196-4346-6-git-send-email-yadi.brar@samsung.com>
On Monday 03 of June 2013 20:39:55 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> From: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
>
> While trying to get rate of "mout_vpllsrc" MUX (parent) for registering
> the "fout_vpll" (child), we found get rate was failing.
>
> So this patch moves the mout_vpllsrc MUX out of the existing common list
> and registers the mout_vpllsrc MUX before the PLL registrations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Tomasz
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c index ddf10ca..70cc6cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock
> exynos5250_fixed_factor_clks[] __initdata = { FFACTOR(none,
> "fout_bplldiv2", "fout_bpll", 1, 2, 0),
> };
>
> +struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks[] __initdata = {
> + MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1),
> +};
> +
> struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
> MUX(none, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1),
> MUX(none, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
> @@ -214,7 +218,6 @@ struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[]
> __initdata = { MUX(none, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1),
> MUX(none, "mout_bpll_fout", mout_bpll_fout_p, PLL_DIV2_SEL, 0, 1),
> MUX(none, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_CDREX, 0, 1),
> - MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1),
> MUX(none, "sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 16, 1),
> MUX(none, "sclk_epll", mout_epll_p, SRC_TOP2, 12, 1),
> MUX(none, "sclk_cpll", mout_cpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 8, 1),
> @@ -490,6 +493,9 @@ void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node
> *np) ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks),
> ext_clk_match);
>
> + samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks));
> +
> apll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_apll", "fin_pll",
> reg_base, NULL, 0);
> mpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_mpll", "fin_pll",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-03 15:09 [PATCH v4 0/6] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] clk: samsung: Use clk->base instead of directly using clk->con0 for PLL3xxx Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-12 20:33 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-12 20:35 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-12 21:19 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-12 21:50 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-12 22:02 ` Andrew Bresticker
2013-06-13 7:02 ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-13 9:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-13 18:35 ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-13 18:43 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-13 19:12 ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table " Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-12 20:43 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-12 21:25 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-12 21:04 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-12 21:06 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-12 21:06 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-12 20:52 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6043487.0U6pzGhZid@flatron \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).