From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C94C0EB64D9 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 07:09:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:Cc:To: From:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=aip6KDxZo3gRveVRflmxa34iyMZk0DBPvUEmNJXNQAI=; b=WC5Bu/oQv6lR+Eq4j0G/yryy6f dY5tXzFkAIb4oL9Iahgg67GikUzFdNI84YsES4OJHC/zR7+QXUquyoj4bE24gqzYeoibpN6Eas9ox hXABboJla3zG+yp5qwsoMUg4K7NNVL3UpLBnFhN5unEUG7TzCZzBwKu26pTHeK8WDP54OfqRMFbJY gUyBmpjqKj71ikJad0xKcz/cLNprzskulM7jvo9hRWAH53Mj7H+t1HKTOAIHBIUPKCYSOYKpR0YLh Wu5/UFmU31jiNWJI5jZZ3VmU9D9/5mM5tA13IivV5dQcBNh4MARaUEdwSD0RpODtZoQJK3Fs2sb/r feapZI/Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qHJ6l-000jup-0d; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 07:08:55 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qHJ6i-000jte-0n for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 07:08:54 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fb7dc16ff0so369872e87.2 for ; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1688627330; x=1691219330; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:organization :references:cc:to:content-language:reply-to:from:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=JfUnFpPoxbpXv4hVJaj/V4G1uyk5fRMTk74kU76zNRE=; b=opLG3C30StFnwtw2D97WUC/wpqBCKDqOkpxCn2ZjWHH1DI9CqWF2MkuNRXM0D4sHq1 14hRCu53BXAkqA6ujinqHTgRvfUnJ69sE+ruRVmkyAB3kBn8PbFyaj8w6OAMP0ziR7OK HH0Ucda7K92gzF9wbeMHlu1HA0Mv/C2PVhA7FfFwZNZqDlpcKCkSIOvWW7thEFf7kX2X wBHXTi39sIeF2srEeWeejyXvkseNNrBwtBqs5txl7ZPFS7a6QNhggsrLVTqU9HR4XRkH W+ePmuSWpPtVKH35Ljoi+0DKfB9DaVOwXnfwNCMqN8HaCQJAqqMwkaMhh/kX2ZYH99/c rZXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688627330; x=1691219330; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:organization :references:cc:to:content-language:reply-to:from:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JfUnFpPoxbpXv4hVJaj/V4G1uyk5fRMTk74kU76zNRE=; b=DF5ka9Iy/Ot0HHgF3/aRLJPlXzY5TG9+kRI4ZMt2la1Hlq62sywnni4muNDqHcgC68 GGpyY+WtwoUtKIMwE5gXqd0d1vBzVGJQPjLguhEHpuelbKc2daYxoeJSGuLoJQoAZKA3 t7Q9sVUc9vvKMXImjqjBWi83gWOAPf4WnxotSWEPUjq2CFGm/KZqjZKSAVTlTd008Vvt 95APqEPqaegLh58hsqiGoVuu5p4ShZLM4KkJNjOJrqCVwUy6c22WaNwxcCS26Dkculfi AKjwGxevnKHNLUk7LzYOMTrHY3VdQtpMxplqSmYQoajc8m2ByS2XSsvbr/2IcvfU+pGe jTMA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZE70NyXedcZAY34LRNxGkVHFxsuzy12b05jvqUiLdD9zwpCU9V 0f7brwR1R0ZBs3IaQ+2uJXshng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEpQZSUA4W58M9O4l4VjBT094yF6YRPsfEHrtX798/vAbVQPcSOV3yudV2XWJ0JAbY/LXpa1Q== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4f06:0:b0:4f6:2a02:fc1a with SMTP id k6-20020ac24f06000000b004f62a02fc1amr1013870lfr.17.1688627330440; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a01:e0a:982:cbb0:15d1:2748:ead4:bdff? ([2a01:e0a:982:cbb0:15d1:2748:ead4:bdff]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l25-20020a7bc459000000b003fbe0da2a06sm1155369wmi.28.2023.07.06.00.08.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <606ed182-14b8-4c8f-37d3-21971ec71f38@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 09:08:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 From: neil.armstrong@linaro.org Content-Language: en-US To: Dmitry Rokosov , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, jbrunet@baylibre.com, jirislaby@kernel.org, khilman@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com Cc: kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com, xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com, kernel@sberdevices.ru, rockosov@gmail.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20230705181833.16137-1-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru> <20230705181833.16137-4-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru> Organization: Linaro Developer Services Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] tty: serial: meson: apply ttyS devname instead of ttyAML for new SoCs In-Reply-To: <20230705181833.16137-4-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230706_000852_354428_73C134FB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 29.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: neil.armstrong@linaro.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On 05/07/2023 20:18, Dmitry Rokosov wrote: > It is worth noting that the devname ttyS is a widely recognized tty name > and is commonly used by many uart device drivers. Given the established > usage and compatibility concerns, it may not be feasible to change the > devname for older SoCs. However, for new definitions, it is acceptable > and even recommended to use a new devname to help ensure clarity and > avoid any potential conflicts on lower or upper software levels. > > For more information please refer to IRC discussion at [1]. > > Links: > [1]: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/linux-amlogic/2023-07-03 > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov > --- > drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c > index dcf994a11a21..ad0748a10db7 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c > @@ -72,16 +72,22 @@ > > #define AML_UART_PORT_NUM 12 > #define AML_UART_PORT_OFFSET 6 > -#define AML_UART_DEV_NAME "ttyAML" > > #define AML_UART_POLL_USEC 5 > #define AML_UART_TIMEOUT_USEC 10000 > > -static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver; > +#define MESON_UART_DRIVER(_devname) meson_uart_driver_##_devname > + > +#define MESON_UART_DRIVER_DECLARE(_devname) \ > + static struct uart_driver MESON_UART_DRIVER(_devname) > + > +MESON_UART_DRIVER_DECLARE(ttyAML); > +MESON_UART_DRIVER_DECLARE(ttyS); Not sure those macros are useful: MESON_UART_DRIVER_DECLARE(ttyAML) vs static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver_ttyAML I prefer the second... > > static struct uart_port *meson_ports[AML_UART_PORT_NUM]; > > struct meson_uart_data { > + struct uart_driver *uart_driver; > bool has_xtal_div2; > }; > > @@ -611,15 +617,21 @@ static int meson_serial_console_setup(struct console *co, char *options) > return uart_set_options(port, co, baud, parity, bits, flow); > } I think the uart_driver meson_uart_driver_ttyXXX should be declared here instead or.. > > -static struct console meson_serial_console = { > - .name = AML_UART_DEV_NAME, > - .write = meson_serial_console_write, > - .device = uart_console_device, > - .setup = meson_serial_console_setup, > - .flags = CON_PRINTBUFFER, > - .index = -1, > - .data = &meson_uart_driver, > -}; > +#define MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE(_devname) meson_serial_console_##_devname > + > +#define MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE_DEFINE(_devname) \ > + static struct console MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE(_devname) = { \ > + .name = __stringify(_devname), \ > + .write = meson_serial_console_write, \ > + .device = uart_console_device, \ > + .setup = meson_serial_console_setup, \ > + .flags = CON_PRINTBUFFER, \ > + .index = -1, \ > + .data = &MESON_UART_DRIVER(_devname), \ > + } ... you could even declare the meson_uart_driver_ttyXXX in this macro instead. > + > +MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE_DEFINE(ttyAML); > +MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE_DEFINE(ttyS); > > static void meson_serial_early_console_write(struct console *co, > const char *s, > @@ -644,18 +656,22 @@ meson_serial_early_console_setup(struct earlycon_device *device, const char *opt > OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE(meson, "amlogic,meson-ao-uart", > meson_serial_early_console_setup); > > -#define MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE (&meson_serial_console) > +#define MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE_PTR(_devname) (&MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE(_devname)) > #else > -#define MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE NULL > +#define MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE_PTR(_devname) (NULL) > #endif > > -static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver = { > - .owner = THIS_MODULE, > - .driver_name = "meson_uart", > - .dev_name = AML_UART_DEV_NAME, > - .nr = AML_UART_PORT_NUM, > - .cons = MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE, > -}; > +#define MESON_UART_DRIVER_DEFINE(_devname) \ > + static struct uart_driver MESON_UART_DRIVER(_devname) = { \ > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, \ > + .driver_name = "meson_uart", \ > + .dev_name = __stringify(_devname), \ > + .nr = AML_UART_PORT_NUM, \ > + .cons = MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE_PTR(_devname), \ > + } > + > +MESON_UART_DRIVER_DEFINE(ttyAML); > +MESON_UART_DRIVER_DEFINE(ttyS); Those macros are fine, but drop the MESON_UART_DRIVER & MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE macros and drop the _DEFINE in those macros. > > static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct platform_device *pdev, > struct uart_port *port) > @@ -681,8 +697,16 @@ static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct platform_device *pdev, > return 0; > } > > +static struct uart_driver *meson_uart_current(const struct meson_uart_data *pd) > +{ > + return (pd && pd->uart_driver) ? > + pd->uart_driver : &MESON_UART_DRIVER(ttyAML); I'll definitely prefer if you use the real variable name everywhere and in the 2 following patches > +} > + > static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > + const struct meson_uart_data *priv_data; > + struct uart_driver *uart_driver; > struct resource *res_mem; > struct uart_port *port; > u32 fifosize = 64; /* Default is 64, 128 for EE UART_0 */ > @@ -729,8 +753,12 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > return ret; > > - if (!meson_uart_driver.state) { > - ret = uart_register_driver(&meson_uart_driver); > + priv_data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > + > + uart_driver = meson_uart_current(priv_data); > + > + if (!uart_driver->state) { > + ret = uart_register_driver(uart_driver); > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, > "can't register uart driver\n"); > @@ -748,7 +776,7 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > port->x_char = 0; > port->ops = &meson_uart_ops; > port->fifosize = fifosize; > - port->private_data = (void *)device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > + port->private_data = (void *)priv_data; > > meson_ports[pdev->id] = port; > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port); > @@ -759,7 +787,7 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > meson_uart_release_port(port); > } > > - ret = uart_add_one_port(&meson_uart_driver, port); > + ret = uart_add_one_port(uart_driver, port); > if (ret) > meson_ports[pdev->id] = NULL; > > @@ -768,10 +796,12 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > static int meson_uart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > + struct uart_driver *uart_driver; > struct uart_port *port; > > port = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > - uart_remove_one_port(&meson_uart_driver, port); > + uart_driver = meson_uart_current(port->private_data); > + uart_remove_one_port(uart_driver, port); > meson_ports[pdev->id] = NULL; > > for (int id = 0; id < AML_UART_PORT_NUM; id++) > @@ -779,7 +809,7 @@ static int meson_uart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > > /* No more available uart ports, unregister uart driver */ > - uart_unregister_driver(&meson_uart_driver); > + uart_unregister_driver(uart_driver); > > return 0; > } Anyway this looks much better :-) Thanks, Neil _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel