From: icenowy@aosc.xyz (Icenowy Zheng)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/5] arm64: only select PINCTRL_SUNXI for Allwinner platforms
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 02:57:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <608421488308240@web22h.yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c878ba53-a33a-e042-2d65-11f86a47b844@arm.com>
01.03.2017, 02:17, "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/02/17 17:24, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> ?As the pinctrl driver selecting is refactored in Kconfig file of
>> ?pinctrl-sunxi, now we can select only PINCTRL_SUNXI for Allwinner
>> ?platform, and the default value of several pinctrl drivers useful on
>> ?ARM64 Allwinner SoCs will become Y.
>>
>> ?Drop the select of per-SoC pinctrl choices, but select PINCTRL_SUNXI.
>>
>> ?Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
>> ?---
>> ??arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 2 +-
>> ??1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> ?diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> ?index 129cc5ae4091..f6db2a938b1e 100644
>> ?--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> ?+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> ?@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ config ARCH_SUNXI
>> ??????????bool "Allwinner sunxi 64-bit SoC Family"
>> ??????????select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
>> ??????????select PINCTRL
>> ?- select PINCTRL_SUN50I_A64
>> ?+ select PINCTRL_SUNXI
>
> Why do we need to add this generic PINCTRL_SUNXI here? This is selected
> already by the SoC specific PINCTRL symbols (see your previous patch).
>
> Cheers,
> Andre.
Oh yes... You're right...
>
>> ??????????help
>> ????????????This enables support for Allwinner sunxi based SoCs like the A64.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-28 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 17:24 [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: sunxi: refactor pinctrl choice selecting for ARM64 Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: only select PINCTRL_SUNXI for Allwinner platforms Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 18:19 ` [linux-sunxi] " Andre Przywara
2017-02-28 18:57 ` Icenowy Zheng [this message]
2017-02-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: fix for Allwinner H5 pinctrl's compatible Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt: bindings: add binding for Allwinner A64 R_PIO pinctrl Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Add A64 R_PIO controller support Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 18:29 ` [linux-sunxi] " Andre Przywara
2017-02-28 18:58 ` Icenowy Zheng
2017-03-01 2:34 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-02-28 18:17 ` [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: sunxi: refactor pinctrl choice selecting for ARM64 Andre Przywara
2017-02-28 18:55 ` Icenowy Zheng
2017-03-01 2:38 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=608421488308240@web22h.yandex.ru \
--to=icenowy@aosc.xyz \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox