From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: icenowy@aosc.xyz (Icenowy Zheng) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 02:57:20 +0800 Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/5] arm64: only select PINCTRL_SUNXI for Allwinner platforms In-Reply-To: References: <20170228172444.59655-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> <20170228172444.59655-2-icenowy@aosc.xyz> Message-ID: <608421488308240@web22h.yandex.ru> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org 01.03.2017, 02:17, "Andre Przywara" : > Hi, > > On 28/02/17 17:24, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> ?As the pinctrl driver selecting is refactored in Kconfig file of >> ?pinctrl-sunxi, now we can select only PINCTRL_SUNXI for Allwinner >> ?platform, and the default value of several pinctrl drivers useful on >> ?ARM64 Allwinner SoCs will become Y. >> >> ?Drop the select of per-SoC pinctrl choices, but select PINCTRL_SUNXI. >> >> ?Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng >> ?--- >> ??arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 2 +- >> ??1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> ?diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> ?index 129cc5ae4091..f6db2a938b1e 100644 >> ?--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> ?+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> ?@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ config ARCH_SUNXI >> ??????????bool "Allwinner sunxi 64-bit SoC Family" >> ??????????select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP >> ??????????select PINCTRL >> ?- select PINCTRL_SUN50I_A64 >> ?+ select PINCTRL_SUNXI > > Why do we need to add this generic PINCTRL_SUNXI here? This is selected > already by the SoC specific PINCTRL symbols (see your previous patch). > > Cheers, > Andre. Oh yes... You're right... > >> ??????????help >> ????????????This enables support for Allwinner sunxi based SoCs like the A64.