From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC V3 2/3] mxs: add driver for ocotp in i.MX23 and i.MX28
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 20:47:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6087001.lBonPVHV5K@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1003885907.22061.1415301932743.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbsltgw00.schlund.de>
On Thursday 06 November 2014 20:25:32 Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> hat am 28. Oktober 2014 um 20:13 geschrieben:
> > [...]
> >
> > I came up with MTD just because a grep for OTP showed most hits in there.
> > I have to admit that I didn't check whether those are actually for
> > the same kind of device or for something else that goes by the same
> > name. Having it in MTD doesn't sound too obscure though.
> >
> > There are a few other references to efuse or otp in the kernel, which means
> > that at some point we probably want to have a common subsystem and user
> > interface for this, either in MTD or standalone.
> >
> > Between drivers/misc/fsl_ocotp.c, drivers/soc/tegra/fuse and
> > drivers/mfd/ab3100-otp.c, is there any commonality that we could
> > base an abstract API on?
>
> i don't have a answer to this question, but how about changing fsl_ocotp driver
> to driver/soc/mxs/fuse with a similiar binary interface like the tegra ones.
>
> Does it make sense to you?
I haven't looked at the drivers, so I don't know if the tegra interface
is any better or worse than the others. Changing everyone to have the same
interface is definitely a good idea, but of course only if the unified
interface is a good one ;-)
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-18 10:32 [PATCH RFC V3 0/3] mxs: add ocotp support for i.MX23 and i.MX28 Stefan Wahren
2014-10-18 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC V3 1/3] mxs: add binding for fsl ocotp Stefan Wahren
2014-10-18 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC V3 2/3] mxs: add driver for ocotp in i.MX23 and i.MX28 Stefan Wahren
2014-10-20 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-20 15:32 ` Stefan Wahren
2014-10-20 17:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-28 17:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-10-28 19:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-06 19:25 ` Stefan Wahren
2014-11-06 19:47 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-01-08 13:59 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-08 14:53 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-01-08 20:47 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-01-09 10:02 ` Thierry Reding
2015-01-12 9:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-11-07 19:14 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-11-07 19:44 ` Stefan Wahren
2014-10-29 7:14 ` Stefan Wahren
2014-10-18 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC V3 3/3] mxs: enable ocotp for " Stefan Wahren
2015-02-25 20:18 ` [PATCH RFC V3 0/3] mxs: add ocotp support " Jörg Krause
2015-02-25 20:27 ` Jörg Krause
2015-02-26 7:11 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-02-26 8:02 ` Jörg Krause
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6087001.lBonPVHV5K@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox