From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: post@twien.net (post at twien.net)
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:05:56 +0200
Subject: ARMADA 370 - Distributed Switch Architecture (dsa) - device tree
In-Reply-To: <20141013182517.GA18105@roeck-us.net>
References: <f1e8d1ba750bfb63f84471d0ec7de988@twien.net>
 <20141013182517.GA18105@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <60c451c4cbeb4666fff3b45ffdcb780e@twien.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Guenter,
I'm doing this for my employer and have currently no plans for 
submitting this upstream. Not that I think we will not be willing to, 
but it's still very premature and I have so far not been able to test 
this. Am basically struggling to get 'dsa' up and working.
Best,
Tormod

On 2014-10-13 20:25, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:14:41PM +0200, post at twien.net wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I have a custom board equipped with an ARMADA 370 SoC (88f6W11) and
>> a Marvell switch chip (88e6352) (I have written a device driver for
>> the latter).
> 
> Hi Tormod,
> 
> coincidentially, I have a DSA driver for 88e6352 almost ready for 
> submitting it
> upstream. What are your plans for your driver ? Do you plan to submit 
> it
> upstream ? Either case, it would be great if you could share a pointer 
> to it
> so we can make sure that it works for both our use cases.
> 
> I have made my patch set available in the 'dsa' branch of
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git
> in case you are interested.
> 
> Thanks,
> Guenter