linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: suzuki.poulose@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] KVM: arm64: Initialize VCPU mdcr_el2 before loading it
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:25:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6103d61d-d22e-218e-0618-7cb7ee27ac82@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2058bc39-b2ea-602e-8e94-6caf470151ec@arm.com>

Hi James,

Many thanks for having a look at the series!

On 11/19/20 4:58 PM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 27/10/2020 17:26, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>> When a VCPU is created, the kvm_vcpu struct is initialized to zero in
>> kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(). On VHE systems, the first time
>> vcpu.arch.mdcr_el2 is loaded on hardware is in vcpu_load(), before it is
>> set to a sensible value in kvm_arm_setup_debug() later in the run loop. The
>> result is that KVM executes for a short time with MDCR_EL2 set to zero.
>>
>> This is mostly harmless as we don't need to trap debug and SPE register
>> accesses from EL1 (we're still running in the host at EL2), but we do set
>> MDCR_EL2.HPMN to 0 which is constrained unpredictable according to ARM DDI
>> 0487F.b, page D13-3620; the required behavior from the hardware in this
>> case is to reserve an unkown number of registers for EL2 and EL3 exclusive
>> use.
>>
>> Initialize mdcr_el2 in kvm_vcpu_vcpu_first_run_init(), so we can avoid the
>> constrained unpredictable behavior and to ensure that the MDCR_EL2 register
>> has the same value after each vcpu_load(), including the first time the
>> VCPU is run.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> index 7a7e425616b5..22ee448aee2b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> @@ -68,6 +68,59 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void)
>> +static void kvm_arm_setup_mdcr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 host_mdcr)
>> +{
>> +	bool trap_debug = !(vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This also clears MDCR_EL2_E2PB_MASK to disable guest access
>> +	 * to the profiling buffer.
>> +	 */
>> +	vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 = host_mdcr & MDCR_EL2_HPMN_MASK;
>> +	vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 |= (MDCR_EL2_TPM |
>> +				MDCR_EL2_TPMS |
>> +				MDCR_EL2_TPMCR |
>> +				MDCR_EL2_TDRA |
>> +				MDCR_EL2_TDOSA);
>> +	if (vcpu->guest_debug) {
>> +		/* Route all software debug exceptions to EL2 */
>> +		vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 |= MDCR_EL2_TDE;
>> +		if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW)
>> +			trap_debug = true;
>> +	}
> This had me confused for a while... could you hint that this is when the guest is being
> 'external' debugged by the VMM? (its clear-er before this change)

I can put a comment above the if statement similar to the one from
kvm_arm_setup_debug(), where this code is lifted from:

        /* Is the VCPU being debugged by userspace? */

What do you think?

Thanks,
Alex

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-27 17:26 [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] KVM: arm64: Initialize VCPU mdcr_el2 before loading it Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:58   ` James Morse
2020-12-02 14:25     ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] dt-bindings: ARM SPE: Highlight the need for PPI partitions on heterogeneous systems Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/16] KVM: arm64: Hide SPE from guests Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/16] arm64: Introduce CPU SPE feature Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:58   ` James Morse
2020-12-02 14:29     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-02 17:23       ` Will Deacon
2020-12-03 10:07         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] KVM: arm64: Introduce VCPU " Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/16] KVM: arm64: Introduce SPE primitives Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:58   ` James Morse
2020-12-02 15:13     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/16] KVM: arm64: Define SPE data structure for each VCPU Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/16] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-05  9:58   ` Haibo Xu
2020-12-02 15:20     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:58   ` James Morse
2020-12-02 16:28     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/16] KVM: arm64: Use separate function for the mapping size in user_mem_abort() Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-05 10:01   ` Haibo Xu
2020-12-02 16:29     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add a new VM device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-05 10:10   ` Haibo Xu
2020-12-02 16:35     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:59   ` James Morse
2021-03-23 14:27     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/16] KVM: arm64: VHE: Clear MDCR_EL2.E2PB in vcpu_put() Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/16] KVM: arm64: Switch SPE context on VM entry/exit Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/16] KVM: arm64: Emulate SPE buffer management interrupt Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/16] KVM: arm64: Enable SPE for guests Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/16] Documentation: arm64: Document ARM Neoverse-N1 erratum #1688567 Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6103d61d-d22e-218e-0618-7cb7ee27ac82@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).