[PATCH v8 8/9] pci: Add support for creating a generic host_bridge from device tree

Will Deacon
2014-07-02T17:31:13Z

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 06:23:55PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:22:30PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:43:33PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > Several platforms use a rather generic version of parsing
> > > the device tree to find the host bridge ranges. Move the common code
> > > into the generic PCI code and use it to create a pci_host_bridge
> > > structure that can be used by arch code.
> > >
> > > Based on early attempts by Andrew Murray to unify the code.
> > > Used powerpc and microblaze PCI code as starting point.
> >
> > I just had a quick look at this to see how it differs from the parsing in
> > pci-host-generic.c and there a few small differences worth discussing.

[...]

> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Apply architecture specific fixups for the ranges */
> > > + return pcibios_fixup_bridge_ranges(resources);
> >
> > I currently mandate at least one non-prefetchable resource in the
> > device-tree. Should I simply drop this restriction, or do I have to somehow
> > hook this into the pcibios callback?
>
> Don't think I understand why you need at least one non-prefetcheable resource
> but if you want to mandate that then the pcibios_fixup_bridge_ranges() would
> be the place to put that check.

I think it was Arnd's idea at the time:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-February/232225.html

and it's probably worth keeping if possible (just to avoid changes to the
behaviour of the existing driver).

However, that means I already need a host-controller callback via
pcibios_fixup_bridge_ranges...

> > > + err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(parent->of_node, bus_range);
> > > + if (err) {
> > > + dev_info(parent, "No bus range for %s, using default [0-255]\n",
> > > + parent->of_node->full_name);
> > > + bus_range->start = 0;
> > > + bus_range->end = 255;
> > > + bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> >
> > What about bus_range->name?
>
> Don't know! Is anyone using it?

I guess /proc/iomem prints it out? I set it in my current driver, if you
want to take a look.

> >
> > > + }
> > > + busno = bus_range->start;
> > > + pci_add_resource(&res, bus_range);
> >
> > I currently truncate the bus range to fit inside the Configuration Space
> > window I have (in the reg property). How can I continue to do that with this
> > patch?
>
> Not easily. Unless I add an argument to this function that will allow you to
> pass in the max number for the bus range, then the code becomes:
>
> + err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(parent->of_node, bus_range);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_info(parent, "No bus range for %s, using default [0-%d]\n",
> + parent->of_node->full_name, max_range);
> + bus_range->start = 0;
> + bus_range->end = max_range;
> + bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> + } else {
> + if (bus_range->end > bus_range->start + max_range) {
> + bus_range->end = bus_range->start + max_range;
> + }
> + }
>
> Or something like that.

Again, take a look at my driver (it's in mainline now) to see how I deal
with this.

Will