From: svenkatr@ti.com (Venkatraman S)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Patch v4] OMAP: sDMA driver: descriptor autoloading feature
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:15:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <618f0c911001060645g4580a83je653fcdb3d0f2e7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B448D11.5060400@nokia.com>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> wrote:
> Venkatraman S wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> [091211 07:01]:
>>>>
>>>> Here is the most updated version of the patch (thanks to Russell's
>>>> review). This patch is applicable to OMAP4xxx as well as OMAP3630
>>>> Reference to previous posts
>>>> v1 ?http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=125012097403050&w=2
>>>> v2 ?http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=125137152606644&w=2
>>>> v3 ?http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45408/
>>>
>>> Do you have a patch for drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c to
>>> use this feature? Or some other driver?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tony
>>
>> I am about to start working on omap_hsmmc to use the descriptor load
>> feature. If the DMA changes are acceptable, I can post the driver
>> patch as well.
>
> I presume this is about performance. ?How does it compare to chained DMA?
> We have a patch for omap_hsmmc for chained DMA that we are still testing.
>
The main difference would be the number of logical channels used.
With chaining, I assume you'd request for (or the API internally
reserves) as many logical channels as there are segments. Here a
single logical channel would do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-11 15:01 [Patch v4] OMAP: sDMA driver: descriptor autoloading feature Venkatraman S
2009-12-28 21:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-01-04 7:03 ` Venkatraman S
2010-01-04 7:10 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-01-04 8:48 ` Venkatraman S
2010-01-04 9:00 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-01-06 13:16 ` Adrian Hunter
2010-01-06 14:45 ` Venkatraman S [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-07 7:59 adrian.hunter at nokia.com
2010-01-07 9:05 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-01-07 9:36 ` S, Venkatraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=618f0c911001060645g4580a83je653fcdb3d0f2e7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=svenkatr@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox