From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:12:29 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] [v5] pinctrl: qcom: add support for sparse GPIOs
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYfAcKrgbgybccurUKTyR0E+tHDyzp7sbXxXxKuyMOGhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1504798409-32041-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org>
 <20170919070422.GI3349@codeaurora.org>
 <CACRpkdZcdLac_wYW+XqtZ=-APo8VmvYL4B1oL-wZyLy8KEs9AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1ecdf6ee-5098-15d3-f85e-66b39a6c25f9@codeaurora.org>
 <CACRpkdaUV1Mjh7U9bBAgZA5Zq1oqN0HBT=VH5NkvPnY4gHxDVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d53e67a2-4f69-752f-ba35-53872d9b9760@codeaurora.org>
 <CACRpkdYfAcKrgbgybccurUKTyR0E+tHDyzp7sbXxXxKuyMOGhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <619f48d2-59c7-c090-4ace-9e8db9f92064@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 9/21/17 7:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> I guess gpio_valid_mask would take precedence over irq_valid_mask.
> I.e if the GPIO is not valid then the IRQ is per definition not valid either.
> 
> Since it is a new thing, we can simply define a semantic like that
> and document it.

So what about my current patches?  I hope you're not asking me to 
rewrite them again.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.