[PATCH 08/27] ARM: mvebu: armada-370-xp: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11

Jason Cooper
2014-12-16T13:03:31Z

Simon,

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:22:21AM +0100, Simon Guinot wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:38:16PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > The current GPL only licensing on the device tree makes it very
> > impractical for other software components licensed under another
> > license.
> >
> > In order to make it easier for them to reuse our device trees,
> > relicense our device trees under a GPL/X11 dual-license.
> >
> > Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> > Cc: Arnaud Ebalard <arno@natisbad.org>
> > Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> > Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
> > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
> > Cc: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@sequanux.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> > Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Gregory,
>
> NAK for me.

Well, I'm a bit surprised that this is the first one. :) Care to
explain why so that we can work towards an amenable compromise?

thx,

Jason.