From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:46:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 08/13] ARM: dts: rv1108: Fix the PMU interrupt number In-Reply-To: References: <20181125211907.9895-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <3361921.c4PKPBIJKP@phil> Message-ID: <6269571.AAM3N1jVdY@phil> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Montag, 26. November 2018, 14:36:01 CET schrieb Otavio Salvador: > Hello Heiko, > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:59 AM Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 25. November 2018, 22:19:02 CET schrieb Otavio Salvador: > > > According to the Rockchip vendor tree the PMU interrupt number is > > > 76, so fix it accordingly. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Berton > > > > looks ok, especially as the TRM I have doesn't list neither irqs :-) > > But please explain the second Signed-off by Fabio? > > > > If Fabio is the original author, the patch From should reflect that > > and the Signed-off-by lines should be swapped. As it is now > > I would expect Fabio being the one sending the patches. > > Or is it supposed to be a "Co-developed-by:"? > > See Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst. > > He works with me and he applied and tested it in our internal tree for > our customer. He reviewed and tested this with me, so I'd like to > provide him credit as well. Reviewed-by: Tested-by: perhaps then? :-) Heiko