[PATCH] ARM: DT: Exynos5250: fix number of interrupt-cells in mct node

[t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa)]

Hi Chander,

On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 16:30:41 Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Two cells were used to specify interrupts in mct node, while second cell
> always remains unused. Hence use only one cell.
> Suggested by Tomasz Figa.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>
> ---
> changes in v2:
> 	- Drop Changes for Exynos4 as done in separate patch by Tomasz
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |   19 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index ef57277..f2f178a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> @@ -102,23 +102,22 @@
>  		compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-mct";
>  		reg = <0x101C0000 0x800>;
>  		interrupt-controller;
> -		#interrups-cells = <2>;
> +		#interrups-cells = <1>;

Those two properties above are unused and in fact incorrect, because MCT is 
not an interrupt controller, so they could be removed in a follow-up patch.

You can also check out the clean-up series I mentioned for other things 
that could be cleaned up in Exynos 5 dtsi files.

>  		interrupt-parent = <&mct_map>;
> -		interrupts = <0 0>, <1 0>, <2 0>, <3 0>,
> -			     <4 0>, <5 0>;
> +		interrupts = <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>;
>  		clocks = <&clock 1>, <&clock 335>;
>  		clock-names = "fin_pll", "mct";
> 
>  		mct_map: mct-map {
> -			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <1>;
>  			#address-cells = <0>;
>  			#size-cells = <0>;
> -			interrupt-map = <0x0 0 &combiner 23 3>,
> -					<0x1 0 &combiner 23 4>,
> -					<0x2 0 &combiner 25 2>,
> -					<0x3 0 &combiner 25 3>,
> -					<0x4 0 &gic 0 120 0>,
> -					<0x5 0 &gic 0 121 0>;
> +			interrupt-map = <0 &combiner 23 3>,
> +					<1 &combiner 23 4>,
> +					<2 &combiner 25 2>,
> +					<3 &combiner 25 3>,
> +					<4 &gic 0 120 0>,
> +					<5 &gic 0 121 0>;
>  		};
>  	};

Otherwise, looks fine. Thanks.

Best regards,
Tomasz