[PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

[PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

[Viresh Kumar]

CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.

Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>        # 3.18
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
 arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
@@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
 CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
 CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
@@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
 CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
 CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
-- 
2.2.0

[PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
> 
> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>        # 3.18
> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

OK, so who should be applying this?

> ---
>  arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
>  arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> @@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
>  CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
>  CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
>  CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y
> -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
> +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> @@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
>  CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
>  CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
>  CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
> -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
> +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
>  CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

[PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

[Viresh Kumar]

On 15 December 2014 at 20:30, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>
>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>        # 3.18
>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> OK, so who should be applying this?

I think you can take it..
@Arnd: Any objections ?

[PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

[Kevin Hilman]

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:

> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>> 
>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>> 
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>        # 3.18
>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> OK, so who should be applying this?
>

Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and
I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.

Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but
I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the
v3.19-rc cycle.

Thanks,

Kevin

[PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

[Nishanth Menon]

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
>
>> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>>
>>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>        # 3.18
>>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>
>> OK, so who should be applying this?
>>
>
> Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and
> I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.
>
> Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but
> I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the
> v3.19-rc cycle.

Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
wait to go through Tony?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/

[PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

[Viresh Kumar]

On 17 December 2014 at 21:31, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
> wait to go through Tony?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/

I think I have seen that as part of Arnd pull request sent today to Linus.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/439

[PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

[Kevin Hilman]

Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> writes:

> On 17 December 2014 at 21:31, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
>> Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
>> wait to go through Tony?
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
>
> I think I have seen that as part of Arnd pull request sent today to Linus.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/439

Right, this was initially planned for v3.19-rc, but since we were
sending another round of pull requests, arm-soc/fixes was included.

Kevin