public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: make iommu subsys_initcall to fix builtin omap3isp
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:37:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6354375.6C9sXAHKbF@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbZRjGEyx0mKmgoWYiOnuvUAka0kTzpLAYbra94Mfpp6qg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ohad,

On Monday 27 February 2012 09:00:51 Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > I'm asking about the probe deferral mechanism. The omap3-isp driver will
> > still call iommu_attach_device() in its probe function. What will happen
> > then ? Will it return an error ? On what basis will it do so ?
> 
> Yes, iommu_attach_device() will fail, and omap3isp's probe function will
> then need to return -EAGAIN to request that its probe function will be
> invoked again later on.
> 
> > That's what the comment in the Makefile is for ;-) I don't think it's a
> > perfect solution either, but it avoids playing with the various initcalls.
> > The OMAP3 IOMMU isn't a subsystem, subsys_initcall() looks a bit like an
> > API abuse to me.
> 
> Yes, it's dirty.
> 
> But it's explicit and consistent across build system changes (without
> imposing anything on the build system). We do it all the time with other
> subsystems. We don't like it, but luckily Grant came up with the deferred
> probing mechanism, which will fix this all very nicely.
> 
> > Are drivers supposed to call iommu_attach_device() in their probe()
> > function or later on ?
> 
> If you can defer attaching to a later point, most commonly to a point
> where the device is opened by the user, it's better - less power will
> be consumed.

I'll try that then. How expensive is the iommu_attach_device() (and detach) 
operation in terms of CPU time ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-01 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-26 10:14 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: make iommu subsys_initcall to fix builtin omap3isp Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-02-26 17:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-02-26 18:30   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-02-26 22:47     ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-02-27  7:00       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-02-27 12:02         ` Joerg Roedel
2012-03-01 16:37         ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2012-03-01 17:12           ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-02-27 13:23 ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6354375.6C9sXAHKbF@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox