From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3362ACA5FA7 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:56:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Re4QQcAs/Cvsl5dDnqb8X6ZnBVY+DhJFENczAUr8r6A=; b=Wm72aw198y95xYMt862WnrZ3YJ pNbkFbHDhrAHaM53ZRvfvI3t5Ao0XC+Otzx2mSYiX4JubffAwNl8I4oRlGSfK7H8n1sFIEzklCnNx +NYaWQ/hcBnCYRXz4HvQYYE6Z+BFPRUfZOF8LGsPZwCdgtqeG1y7TXMQIZJu9WJPAn1I8oSOMsN7v y8OQe/POzwz+KzIia8uhd1htetHiqt6upp5HZePlz//Q085Yj7Wko09WYG9W8jV0NnLGSitRQsOpz okKa1GcMG0nsSx6OiqfOdspGIqQp3+4HJy8vR1o9VXTKk90k1ySLt1LevH49sZ0Mgk2sMRY6hn/Pl B4SPlgig==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBfoA-00000004eHQ-2yb5; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:56:18 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBfo8-00000004eH2-0nPA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:56:16 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97584406E0; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FD271F00898; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:56:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790718975; bh=Re4QQcAs/Cvsl5dDnqb8X6ZnBVY+DhJFENczAUr8r6A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=im/ErjYUssfdgz/Kf72KQ0N245vq4BW+IBFkzEpUWQAoG3lSon1uiI+p32sa8Fdou h7Oy535Oa89aPfdBABT/h2WoTSkyA79XbU0X6Gk+azJLeF86D89+6XxkefMS0IcTRm XF+blcrtiMQN7CP1L6+k8Oj95J2XLir6SRSF7Y7VmmrVhyfzzo10T5IssJLLE5Z/FC taSyRJTDVeKVgKkHirWNKhq9OjbXeC3pVJ2y7o74vZQe+IjOwpPcM1A1ctXl5w4wYU zA0v7yfeFtbBpPMDEEJrvkZo4gor8xSlUnC4TXrxMAM9k9u+puj9j21FMEwBPOVEJ5 RSoQirlxQI/fA== Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 22:56:10 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Shuah Khan , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] kselftest/arm64: Move exit calls out of fp-stress loads Message-ID: <636db593-b6b6-4338-b9b0-e87c54111d14@sirena.org.uk> References: <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-0-31bce995b49b@kernel.org> <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-3-31bce995b49b@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zPKB6sLRXO6DyADj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: 1 bulls, 3 cows. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --zPKB6sLRXO6DyADj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 05:22:44PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 06:06:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > No functional change. > I don't think this is accurate, as you're changing the register into which a > value is loaded (x0 instead of x1). > That seems to be correct to me, but worth calling out that you're fixing that up > in the commit message and dropping this line. That's actually an unintentional bugfix, the original code just uses whatever random value was in x0 as an exit code. Probably that was non-zero so it all works out but still. --zPKB6sLRXO6DyADj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmq8M/oACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DbeAf8C8nZFlnRID2OBd8OZhIoqwONWnOjUfc7e88n8BL3U3f9gqi0aLKUu21a 49TZ0kD3k7FLWElNkch4olF4stGSIOSX3oXbf/1CDqg4idW0/zJZNriF7p6olzD2 VtgfsTxGHdHmvno6HUx3mQAQ0iDghOrx4VWj/VeOmnysW+XH2xisYGx+hBTdS9To WMZFDoE9kTTmDHHArh6KqxPcVGHEzTqJ5lgRv0Fj5p8KP/Px5QEosC+24dNnQcpR zAiI4W2PjFFKXgUbs8QPVwWNJSz7kHNDPdCh1zfXmgShEecIX2GUrDyYR7cWzmf6 c4XrVFVy895JLbLtZviifPCyQOzP6A== =90AP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zPKB6sLRXO6DyADj--