From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C93CED611 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:04:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Date:To:Cc:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7BhRtVer07YSmf3uJk8dkE+ru60nI1c5gbZWmRKLx4U=; b=KCs7YjbmY4UP5PLMr8CFxTaaKg BW4tZ2C0GKotvKuKU/sptjqq3SZX9odR/NhfQR62EJXNDda1f5e/RKVPlctnaiCh17MsQXrdhuHjo k8BamhfZwxxiffxEqldmdpPssCcUB5Gmy4/TLSSdMhQBD3hxrALOnKI91f1mnhM19ijbiPsEhEFEv vWqUZ5Qzi0OIAEsJdsPdA6LjQU5uzCuNOKNUMVssmfUpj9IKHgL3Ks0N/0iEaPy9/g3q3+uZ2pUek U4cWtA5ZgILzUH0WxofGAvO9ihEBA3UjwkYhooTxClveXeqs+HMJ8Mv+ALnjvxF4Ag4cw5Pgr5+sL gfhQqXLg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1syfio-0000000AzmQ-1DGf; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 23:03:58 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1syfhS-0000000AzeG-467Q; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 23:02:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FE65C5E48; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4211C4CECE; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:02:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728514953; bh=7BhRtVer07YSmf3uJk8dkE+ru60nI1c5gbZWmRKLx4U=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=E9j1wj/IK8+zWVsw3GDXc32fzQBV56e6s919r8ISQ7Gxx8Zi29WFJOzG+XEIlfNje gYQbj1E0ZSi3Nk+UOCSGiIdJ2NEwGzL9gfq4p57K9Df1xEPhIHwCLOopfFIVahkuBX 9BNTMujE04hylORPvpd8l18Ska1agjNl0mGPYMHy/E8lySPIXjH3inWgLRD/uBNAe5 jsH+ZOVPrR7v2vAGPyibHz7BRiN5OKV2yevpdkQickYBoPRKShj1pj+X5eMveFfOFj 2+kPOjYJ+Zc/mH9K50VV/mAgr3OZei6nZj1QkaJ0bogpzj4atf3UCtIcgE8skqIxrI FJclfe/LR2xVA== Message-ID: <6421c16edc9f5f7e7a2d24a17309a69d.sboyd@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <5815159.DvuYhMxLoT@diego> References: <20240912133204.29089-2-ziyao@disroot.org> <5815159.DvuYhMxLoT@diego> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix finding of maximum clock ID From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yao Zi To: Heiko =?utf-8?q?St=C3=BCbner?= , Michael Turquette , Sebastian Reichel , Yao Zi Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:02:30 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241009_160235_080601_A30A73D4 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.59 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Quoting Heiko St=C3=BCbner (2024-09-14 02:57:35) > Am Donnerstag, 12. September 2024, 15:32:05 CEST schrieb Yao Zi: > > If an ID of a branch's child is greater than current maximum, we should > > set new maximum to the child's ID, instead of its parent's. > >=20 > > Fixes: 2dc66a5ab2c6 ("clk: rockchip: rk3588: fix CLK_NR_CLKS usage") > > Signed-off-by: Yao Zi >=20 > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner >=20 > @Stephen: can you put that on top of the other Rockchip changes for 6.12 > please? >=20 Sorry I missed this one. I'll put it on clk-fixes.