From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, soc@kernel.org,
"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2 2/7] firmware: tegra: Changes for v6.2-rc1
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:23:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6476b823-b47c-461c-b948-752e2671015f@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y34FCQ3xTmcjqKRT@orome>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022, at 12:33, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:25:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022, at 18:12, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> > firmware: tegra: bpmp: Do not support big-endian
>>
>> I pulled the branch, but I think this patch is inconsistent with
>> our normal approach: Since all ARMv7 and ARMv8 processors can
>> run with both big-endian and little-endian kernels, we normally
>> try to keep drivers portable between both ways, even though we
>> don't expect anyone to actually want a big-endian kernel any
>> more. Changing portable code to nonportable code doesn't seem
>> helpful here.
>
> The only reason I dropped this is because the driver is in itself
> inconsistent. Parts of it use byte-swapping for 32-bit values and other
> parts don't. I was originally going to fix big-endian support but it
> would've required changes to the BPMP ABI header to avoid sparse
> warnings in lots of places, then these ABI changes would've needed to
> trickle up to the canonical source, etc. All of that didn't seem worth
> the effort if we couldn't even test this in any way. So the easiest fix
> was to stop pretending and drop the partial support.
Right
>> On the other hand, there are already examples of important
>> drivers that are fundamentally incompatible with big-endian
>> mode, notably drivers/efi/, which is required on a lot of
>> machines.
>>
>> You don't have to revert this patch, but it would be helpful
>> to mark code that is explicitly unportable with a 'depends
>> on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN' line in Kconfig. If you agree, I can
>> add that.
>
> Yes, feel free to add that.
Added this commit to the soc/drivers branch now:
commit 4ddb1bf1a83783cebdb174b0efaf62f63ad64e0b
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:21:16 2022 +0100
tegra: mark BPMP driver as little-endian only
The BPMP firmware driver never worked on big-endian kernels, and
cannot easily be made portable. Add a dependency to make this clear
in case anyone ever wants to try a big-endian kernel on this hardware.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/Y34FCQ3xTmcjqKRT@orome/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/tegra/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/tegra/Kconfig
index 1c8ba1f47c7c..cde1ab8bd9d1 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/tegra/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/firmware/tegra/Kconfig
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config TEGRA_IVC
config TEGRA_BPMP
bool "Tegra BPMP driver"
depends on ARCH_TEGRA && TEGRA_HSP_MBOX && TEGRA_IVC
+ depends on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
help
BPMP (Boot and Power Management Processor) is designed to off-loading
the PM functions which include clock/DVFS/thermal/power from the CPU.
>> Do you know of other tegra drivers that only work on
>> little-endian?
>
> I'm not aware of any that explicitly wouldn't work with big endian, but
> it's not something we've ever tested. I know that people have in the
> past done experiments with running emulated Tegra on QEMU in big endian
> mode, but it's probably not something that's very common.
Ok, thanks!
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 17:12 [GIT PULL v2 1/7] soc/tegra: Changes for v6.2-rc1 Thierry Reding
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [GIT PULL v2 2/7] firmware: tegra: " Thierry Reding
2022-11-22 21:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-23 11:33 ` Thierry Reding
2022-11-23 13:23 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2022-11-25 10:12 ` Thierry Reding
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [GIT PULL v2 3/7] clk: " Thierry Reding
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [GIT PULL v2 4/7] dt-bindings: " Thierry Reding
2022-11-29 17:16 ` Rob Herring
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [GIT PULL v2 5/7] memory: tegra: " Thierry Reding
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [GIT PULL v2 6/7] ARM: tegra: Device tree changes " Thierry Reding
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [GIT PULL v2 7/7] arm64: " Thierry Reding
2022-11-22 22:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-23 11:36 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6476b823-b47c-461c-b948-752e2671015f@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).