From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11DA4C25B08 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:47:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZbdGklQbWspv0ecPKCCZqMbcI9r15yDRqc7vgm9u3bM=; b=CPY71wvj8qOmpF VXPb5b8zMahDymTG7LDLcMNYGM9AAS0xLsGmlncj4FLUPCmE4A6q2/QV57LI2vsjPyVZt7aoO6qh1 9ACl7O4tz0/nyG8aLPQP/KAYJBgSItulYhDhCarGPzbDYlK3n/92Gd9ba02XcCYvwy990McrqEYJf TJrYIMnARoruV4SZVOXz/K8e+r6W+zon4j2viZmzn6PEi5cc64Z0+bjYYfNyhYsepuUQSjuxfsyEM 36QPAMN76bzhJwTme0osZPYL/Y5yOq/6f0BEweXyBDCWYOc6olqlvhXPglW5SVgSb21qN9oZG5QeK U7/OlPZ87xfD00Va2/KA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oOJNG-002VLd-0c; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:46:22 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oOJNB-002VHD-8a for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:46:20 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id o2so19097023lfb.1 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:46:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc; bh=gQ9ZdHAonv1+cNCneY42f+VkcN8uTabWejW5IY05OD4=; b=KTjTHibusJ3Q5B6hEEPhteJ85Ffv8KvOEn3uUw/xQVRdL6Zo1CkYrEOL7ZAC1Tw1Ou uU5RufF2Tdvu2+nmf2C0KTfR7A2Igxvxw8T/eUeKx52INZGiEKRka7WEIwxCR2CZ+ZSJ e/vQmpHliCd7Cqy1Zy50sfUCIIZLixaPjkqOK/7InUSjMIC23bUaIt6Mck1XWtEetmMJ xqdxUZuSJKJ3/glf0Mj/ekPD8QxDCZ/UHom2kzqDSWgHHwSlRbzFsqaKV29BqFV401mW L7PQ51pKmSprJ5+3vGlxrNT1VYAzmVYMxSR7p0A1IxGR+jY3AsB4EmseuYJKfMqe6EzN W1KA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=gQ9ZdHAonv1+cNCneY42f+VkcN8uTabWejW5IY05OD4=; b=YP5FXL/57Ge6nZFmOoHN5D0kzSaLTz2hKKatKx7o0NNvJG0d/kVMNzR8QTaZjy/1CK FABdjY2in+snLZr+dN13n/ZQhaKY4xhviBUObho3edBiizWisUxGES24PjSyLW1kerjv +y+0N253aRvcnvv4wmh8XeY1PjOHFyuzKoaAUiFrAc/KCbaod5mHVBqfxNil1HAjfCCV DceTfpXOhCnbEXrOpex26MxyThuTj1DwRZnB5ImmvBVgj8Xjpz/fxLoDpJVYdZsVlmwv T9mbmOVXg+e4SCQ9TZq675h1aX9zezrgv3u+8rIpprI2Qt3VN1UzjCHXGd/JvukENFH2 lvCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2zI+LRTH1u01Y4+nBbfvXMfbD879yljHZcefXMAv5rnWxTO65u r5lJ3NF0vxgz1a4+MZ5oI/+Z5Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4vOLQVaDpNaTlrgQpr6MQJs6T1zj+svIXXP/Rtynk4ey8sYo2c1ptChOUd++TTtrnFyrV1cw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:6b0b:0:b0:48a:e7de:d34c with SMTP id d11-20020a196b0b000000b0048ae7ded34cmr8780224lfa.454.1660743973563; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:14bb:ae:539c:1b1c:14b7:109b:ed76? (d15l54h48cw7vbh-qr4-4.rev.dnainternet.fi. [2001:14bb:ae:539c:1b1c:14b7:109b:ed76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10-20020a05651c032a00b0025d5eb5dde7sm2151655ljp.104.2022.08.17.06.46.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64913eef-8b4f-7617-578b-53ddc22bd06e@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:46:11 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] regulator: dt-bindings: Add Allwinner D1 LDOs Content-Language: en-US To: Samuel Holland , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Maxime Ripard , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev References: <20220815043436.20170-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20220815043436.20170-2-samuel@sholland.org> <03de0f7b-9251-a5c0-91a1-5f2b5d41d8a0@sholland.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <03de0f7b-9251-a5c0-91a1-5f2b5d41d8a0@sholland.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220817_064617_379866_A2D9060C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 17/08/2022 11:15, Samuel Holland wrote: >>> + audio-codec@2030000 { >>> + compatible = "simple-mfd", "syscon"; >> >> This cannot be on its own. Both require device specific compatible. > > Again, the device-specific compatible does not exist, because the binding for > the audio codec has not been written (and it will be quite nontrivial). > > So I can: > 1) Leave the example as-is until the audio codec binding gets written, > and fill in the specific compatible at that time. > 2) Remove the example, with the reasoning that the example really > belongs with the MFD parent (like for the other regulator). Then > there will be no example until the audio codec binding is written. > 3) Drop the analog LDOs from this series entirely, and some parts > of the SoC (like thermal monitoring) cannot be added to the DTSI > until the audio codec binding is written. > > What do you think? > > The same question applies for the D1 SoC DTSI, where I use this same construct. > > (And technically this does validate with the current schema.) BTW, it validates only because of limitation in DT schema. Such combination is not allowed and I wonder if we can make the schema stricter... Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel