From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:31:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6499926.sQm3J8L764@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140903163130.GM3127@leverpostej>
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 17:31:30 Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> However, I'm not sure I follow the reasoning for making this
> significantly harder, and even ignoring that I don't think this does
> make things significantly harder. Especially so if we have a PSCI node
> but not an enable method -- in that case its trivial to patch in an
> unrelated enable-method anyhow.
Right, it's not actually much harder. A better way to look at it is
probably that we document what which parts we expect to stay constant
and which parts are to be filled out by the boot loader. Independent
of what PSCI implementation the boot loader provides, we would like
to see enable-method="psci".
I just saw that Geoff had a related comment, and documenting this
would make it clearer to other reviewers, as well as people that
happen to look at this file as a base for new platforms.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-03 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-03 15:13 [PATCH V3 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Bhupesh Sharma
2014-09-03 15:13 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] Documentation: DT: Add bindings for FSL NS16550A UART Bhupesh Sharma
2014-09-03 15:13 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] Documentation: DT: Add entry for FSL LS2085A SoC and Simulator model Bhupesh Sharma
2014-09-03 15:13 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] Documentation: DT: Add entry for FSL Management Complex Bhupesh Sharma
2014-09-03 15:13 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Bhupesh Sharma
2014-09-03 18:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-04 7:55 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-20 20:35 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-03 15:13 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] arm64: dts/Makefile: Add support for FSL's LS2085A simulator model Bhupesh Sharma
2014-09-03 15:13 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] arm64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC in Kconfig and defconfig Bhupesh Sharma
2014-09-03 15:29 ` [PATCH V3 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-03 15:36 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-03 15:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-03 15:42 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-03 15:56 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-03 16:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-03 16:09 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-03 16:10 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-03 16:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-03 16:31 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-03 18:31 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-09-04 9:13 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-04 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-04 16:32 ` Stuart Yoder
2014-09-09 11:46 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-09 13:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-20 20:35 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-22 13:55 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-24 14:50 ` Stuart Yoder
2014-09-03 18:30 ` Geoff Levand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6499926.sQm3J8L764@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox