From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] xen: introduce XENPF_settime64
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:10:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6642964.WydNcvXaCu@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5644B08F.9000205@oracle.com>
On Thursday 12 November 2015 10:30:23 Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> > index 663c2ea..3bbd377 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> > @@ -134,10 +134,10 @@ static int xen_pvclock_gtod_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > if (!was_set && timespec_compare(&now, &next_sync) < 0)
> > return NOTIFY_OK;
> >
> > - op.cmd = XENPF_settime;
> > - op.u.settime.secs = now.tv_sec;
> > - op.u.settime.nsecs = now.tv_nsec;
> > - op.u.settime.system_time = xen_clocksource_read();
> > + op.cmd = XENPF_settime32;
> > + op.u.settime32.secs = now.tv_sec;
> > + op.u.settime32.nsecs = now.tv_nsec;
> > + op.u.settime32.system_time = xen_clocksource_read();
>
> Can/should we switch to time64 here? (This would require a couple more
> changes but they would all be local to this routine).
We definitely should. We are in the process of removing all uses of
timespec from the kernel in favor of timespec64, and this requires
changing the Xen code as well if we want to do it right. I suppose that
both Dom0 and DomU will have to support the old and the new interface
for x86, so we have a fallback if the 64-bit interface fails.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-11 16:49 [PATCH v3 0/6] Xen wallclock on arm and arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] xen: rename dom0_op to platform_op Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-12 15:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-12 15:23 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] xen/arm: introduce HYPERVISOR_platform_op on arm and arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] xen: introduce XENPF_settime64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-12 15:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-12 16:10 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-11-12 16:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-12 17:16 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-12 19:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] arm: extend pvclock_wall_clock with sec_hi Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] xen/arm: introduce xen_read_wallclock Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 20:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-12 11:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] xen/arm: set the system time in Xen via the XENPF_settime64 hypercall Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 20:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6642964.WydNcvXaCu@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).