From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: slongerbeam@gmail.com (Steve Longerbeam) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:14:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v8 00/34] i.MX Media Driver In-Reply-To: <43887f25-bb73-9020-0909-d275c319aaad@mentor.com> References: <1496860453-6282-1-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <43887f25-bb73-9020-0909-d275c319aaad@mentor.com> Message-ID: <6653b2bd-b302-f502-b3cd-3b7a316e492f@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/11/2017 01:05 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > On 06/10/2017 02:26 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On 10/06/17 01:16, Steve Longerbeam wrote: >>> >>> On 06/07/2017 12:02 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>>> We're still waiting for an Ack for patch 02/34, right? >>>> >>> Hi Hans, Rub has provided an Ack for patch 2. >>> >>>> Other than that everything is ready AFAICT. >>>> >>> But as Pavel pointed out, in fact we are missing many >>> Acks still, for all of the dts source changes (patches >>> 4-14), as well as really everything else (imx-media staging >>> driver patches). >> No Acks needed for the staging part. It's staging, so not held >> to the same standards as non-staging parts. That doesn't mean >> Acks aren't welcome, of course. > Acks are wanted for particular i.MX DTS changes including device > tree binding descriptions. > > Shawn, please bless the series. > I second that request! There are a couple minor update to the ARM dts patches for imx6, I will post a new series for them. But there should not be anything of much controversy in these ARM dts patches. Steve