Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-i2s: fix LRCLK polarity in i2s mode

From: Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@gmail.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	 Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@gmail.com>
Cc: "Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@perex.cz>,
	"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>, "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	"Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
	"Marcus Cooper" <codekipper@gmail.com>,
	"Clément Péron" <peron.clem@gmail.com>,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-i2s: fix LRCLK polarity in i2s mode
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 10:04:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6662bf1b61bbc_2f51737023@njaxe.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606-savvy-wallaby-of-champagne-d4a50e@houat>

Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > -	/*
> > -	 * DAI clock polarity
> > -	 *
> > -	 * The setup for LRCK contradicts the datasheet, but under a
> > -	 * scope it's clear that the LRCK polarity is reversed
> > -	 * compared to the expected polarity on the bus.
> > -	 */
> 
> I think we should keep that comment somewhere.

I think that keeping that comment would be very misleading since the LRCLK
setup would not contradict the datasheet anymore [1][2].

Also, do you recall any details about the mentioned scope test setup? Was i2s
mode tested in that occasion? It would help clarify the situation.

Could anyone verify this patch against H3/H6 SoCs?

[1]: https://linux-sunxi.org/images/4/4b/Allwinner_H3_Datasheet_V1.2.pdf
section 8.6.7.2
[2]: https://linux-sunxi.org/images/4/46/Allwinner_H6_V200_User_Manual_V1.1.pdf
section 7.2.5.2

Thanks,
Matteo Martelli

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel