From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com (Ravi Bangoria)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:49:44 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v8 5/6] trace_uprobe/sdt: Prevent multiple reference
 counter for same uprobe
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW5g1dOnceA=kqfpC+rR6EguJaR+wPwY9nSWLbGSSj5XjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180809041856.1547-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
 <20180809041856.1547-6-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
 <CAPhsuW5g1dOnceA=kqfpC+rR6EguJaR+wPwY9nSWLbGSSj5XjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <66f84261-aa3e-4692-a124-09537fda4312@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Song,

On 08/11/2018 01:42 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> Do we really need this given we already have PATCH 4/6?
> uprobe_regsiter() can be called
> out of trace_uprobe, this patch won't catch all conflicts anyway.

Right but it, at least, catch all conflicts happening via trace_uprobe.

I don't mind in removing this patch but I would like to get an opinion of
Oleg/Srikar/Steven/Masami.

Thanks,
Ravi