From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:34:44 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vsdummytimersupportruntime In-Reply-To: <20110223195533.GC16041@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1297510187-31547-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1297510187-31547-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20110220110341.GA15494@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110223163635.GA16041@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <780a7a77ef7a93b801ca178e1518e05b@mail.gmail.com> <2d63c430d007703753afa4ae98902341@mail.gmail.com> <20110223190305.GB16041@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110223195533.GC16041@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <67a61c19606a2125fce3355d444a338f@mail.gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux at arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:26 AM > To: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Kevin Hilman; linux-arm- > kernel at lists.infradead.org; tony at atomide.com; David Brown; Daniel > Walker; Bryan Huntsman; Kukjin Kim; Paul Mundt; Magnus Damm; Colin > Cross; Erik Gilling; Srinidhi Kasagar; Linus Walleij > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers > vsdummytimersupportruntime > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:41:38AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux at arm.linux.org.uk] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:33 AM > > > To: Santosh Shilimkar > > > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Kevin Hilman; linux-arm- > > > kernel at lists.infradead.org; tony at atomide.com; David Brown; > Daniel > > > Walker; Bryan Huntsman; Kukjin Kim; Paul Mundt; Magnus Damm; > Colin > > > Cross; Erik Gilling; Srinidhi Kasagar; Linus Walleij > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs > > > dummytimersupportruntime > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:28:11PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar > wrote: > > > > Patch 6759/1 and patch 6760/1 in patch system > > > > > > Was there any difference between 6760 and 6753 ? > > Nope. > > I just rebased them together and pushed > > Well, both patches are identical, so I'll stick with 6753/1 which > I've already merged. > Thanks. I got discarded messege for 6753, so I submitted it. As you noticed, they are same.