From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 08:50:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode In-Reply-To: <20161016153316.rsrcgnki6kn7gola@finsecur.com> References: <1444163325-3041-1-git-send-email-sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com> <20151007110112.GD3485@piout.net> <20161016153316.rsrcgnki6kn7gola@finsecur.com> Message-ID: <67fe262e-31e4-b9dc-da71-af601079bfec@roeck-us.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : >>> Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: >>> at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with >>> at91sam9260-wdt not using a device tree no longer reboot if the watchdog >>> times out while the CPU is in idle state. Removing the >>> AT91_WDT_WDIDLEHLT flag that was set by default fixes this. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Rochet >>> Fixes: 5161b31dc39a ("watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support") >>> Cc: # 3.14+ >> >> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni >> >> However, we don't really care about that for kernels after 3.18 as no >> users are using pdata anymore. >> I think you could send a follow-up patch removing pdata support >> completely. > > Looks like this one falls through the cracks, it didn't reach mainline > and therefore wasn't applied to stable branches. > Possibly that happened because you did not copy the watchdog mailing list. Guenter > I just checked, it still apply properly on today's linux-next branch. > > Cheers, > Sylvain >