Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: labbott@redhat.com (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: How to debug "insecure W+X mapping"?
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:30:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <680ec27a-1557-f2d9-8159-bd49326bd36c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bff5a2b3-0d93-5f55-c129-4b14a5a09b45@codeaurora.org>

On 12/12/2017 02:57 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> We have a 4.10-based kernel that occasionally displays an insecure W+X mapping (courtesy of CONFIG_DEBUG_WX):
> 
> [??? 7.151680] arm64/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address 0000345a049d2000/0x345a049d2000
> ...
> [??? 7.435481] Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, 4 W+X pages found, 0 non-UXN pages found
> 
> The number of actual W+X pages varies, e.g. sometimes it says 6 pages.
> 
> How do I go about debugging this? How do I identify the source of 0000345a049d2000?	
> 

That's a funny address. The check was written to scan the init_mm
page table but that's not a kernel address on arm64. It almost looks
like something set up a userspace mapping very early in the boot process?

I'd start by dumping the physical address at that address to
see if that gives a suggestion where the mapping came from.

Thanks,
Laura

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-12 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-12 22:57 How to debug "insecure W+X mapping"? Timur Tabi
2017-12-12 23:30 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2017-12-13 11:58   ` [PATCH] arm64: fix CONFIG_DEBUG_WX address reporting (was: Re: How to debug "insecure W+X mapping"?) Mark Rutland
2017-12-14 19:02     ` [PATCH] arm64: fix CONFIG_DEBUG_WX address reporting Laura Abbott
2017-12-14 21:34       ` Timur Tabi
2017-12-14 19:03     ` Timur Tabi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=680ec27a-1557-f2d9-8159-bd49326bd36c@redhat.com \
    --to=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox