linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	quentin.schulz@cherry.de, sebastian.reichel@collabora.com,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dse@thaumatec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] MIPI DSI phy for rk3588
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:09:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6831884.31tnzDBltd@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213210554.1645755-1-heiko@sntech.de>

Am Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2025, 22:05:46 MEZ schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> This adds the phy driver need for DSI output on rk3588.
> 
> The phy itself is used for both DSI output and CSI input, though the
> CSI part for the whole chain needs a lot more work, so is left out for
> now and only the DSI part implemented.
> 
> This allows the rk3588 with its current VOP support to drive a DSI display
> using the DSI2 controller driver I'll submit in a next step.
> 
> Only generic phy interfaces are used, so the DSI part is pretty straight
> forward.
> 
> changes in v6:
> - rebase onto 6.14-rc1
> - add Krzysztof binding review
> - v5 was sent at the beginning of december '24, so probably has been lost
> 
> changes in v5:
> - add bitfield.h for the FIELD_PROP definition
>   (reported by kernel-test-robot)
> - add Sebastian's Reviewed-by
> - add Conor's Ack to the dt-binding
> 
> changes in v4:
> - moved to #phy-cells = 1 as suggested by Sebastian, with the argument
>   denoting the requested phy-type (C-PHY, D-PHY). This works similarly
>   how the Mediatek C/D-PHY already implements this, see mails around:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230608200552.GA3303349-robh@kernel.org/
> - dropped Krzysztof's review tag from the binding because of this
> - dropped custom UPDATE macro and use FIELD_PREP instead
> - build a FIELD_PREP_HIWORD macro for the GRF settings
> - add received Tested-by tags
> 
> changes in v3:
> - add Krzysztof review tag to the binding
> - address Sebastian's review comments
>   - better error handling
>   - dropping empty function
>   - headers
>   - not using of_match_ptr - this should also make the
>     test-robot happier
> 
> changes in v2:
> - fix error in dt-binding example
> - drop unused frequency table
> - pull in some more recent improvements from the vendor-kernel
>   which includes a lot less magic values
> - already include the support for rk3576
> - use dev_err_probe
> 
> Heiko Stuebner (2):
>   dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI C-/D-PHY schema
>   phy: rockchip: Add Samsung MIPI D-/C-PHY driver
> 
>  .../phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml       |   87 +
>  drivers/phy/rockchip/Kconfig                  |   12 +
>  drivers/phy/rockchip/Makefile                 |    1 +
>  .../phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-dcphy.c | 1604 +++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 1704 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
>  create mode 100644 drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-dcphy.c

Forgot to transplant from the v5 cover-letter - the series got a 

Tested-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>

on RK3588 Tiger with Haikou Video Demo in [0]


[0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/63cda072-3671-42c9-9650-7a3ece39dec6@cherry.de





      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13 21:05 [PATCH v6 0/2] MIPI DSI phy for rk3588 Heiko Stuebner
2025-02-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI C-/D-PHY schema Heiko Stuebner
2025-02-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] phy: rockchip: Add Samsung MIPI D-/C-PHY driver Heiko Stuebner
2025-02-14 12:13   ` Vinod Koul
2025-02-19 22:51     ` Heiko Stübner
2025-03-12 15:51       ` Vinod Koul
2025-02-13 21:09 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6831884.31tnzDBltd@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dse@thaumatec.com \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).