From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
To: wojackbb@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com,
chiranjeevi.rapolu@linux.intel.com, haijun.liu@mediatek.com,
m.chetan.kumar@linux.intel.com, ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com,
loic.poulain@linaro.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2] [PATCH net-next v2] net: wwan: t7xx: Change PM_AUTOSUSPEND_MS to 5000
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:54:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6835fde6-0863-49e8-90e8-be88e86ef346@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241114102002.481081-1-wojackbb@gmail.com>
Hello Jack,
On 14.11.2024 12:20, wojackbb@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jack Wu <wojackbb@gmail.com>
>
> Because optimizing the power consumption of t7XX,
> change auto suspend time to 5000.
>
> The Tests uses a script to loop through the power_state
> of t7XX.
> (for example: /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:72\:00.0/power_state)
>
> * If Auto suspend is 20 seconds,
> test script show power_state have 0~5% of the time was in D3 state
> when host don't have data packet transmission.
>
> * Changed auto suspend time to 5 seconds,
> test script show power_state have 50%~80% of the time was in D3 state
> when host don't have data packet transmission.
>
> We tested Fibocom FM350 and our products using the t7xx and they all
> benefited from this.
Possible negative outcomes for data transmission still need
clarification. Let me repeat it here.
On 06.11.2024 13:10, 吳逼逼 wrote:
> Receiving or sending data will cause PCIE to change D3 Cold to D0 state.
Am I understand it correctly that receiving IP packets on downlink will
cause PCIe link re-activation?
I am concerned about a TCP connection that can be idle for a long period
of time. For example, an established SSH connection can stay idle for
minutes. If I connected to a server and execute something like this:
user@host$ sleep 20 && echo "Done"
Will I eventually see the "Done" message or will the autosuspended modem
effectively block any incoming traffic? And how long does it take for
the modem to wake up and deliver a downlink packet to the host? Have you
measured StDev change?
> Signed-off-by: Jack Wu <wojackbb@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2:
> * supplementary commit information
> ---
> ---
> drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c
> index e556e5bd49ab..dcadd615a025 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> #define T7XX_INIT_TIMEOUT 20
> #define PM_SLEEP_DIS_TIMEOUT_MS 20
> #define PM_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS 1500
> -#define PM_AUTOSUSPEND_MS 20000
> +#define PM_AUTOSUSPEND_MS 5000
> #define PM_RESOURCE_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 10000
> #define PM_RESOURCE_POLL_STEP_US 100
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 10:20 [net-next,v2] [PATCH net-next v2] net: wwan: t7xx: Change PM_AUTOSUSPEND_MS to 5000 wojackbb
2024-11-14 15:33 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-11-14 18:54 ` Sergey Ryazanov [this message]
2024-11-15 23:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-19 1:01 ` Sergey Ryazanov
2024-11-19 1:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-19 1:50 ` Sergey Ryazanov
2024-11-19 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-11 2:01 jackbb_wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6835fde6-0863-49e8-90e8-be88e86ef346@gmail.com \
--to=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com \
--cc=chiranjeevi.rapolu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haijun.liu@mediatek.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=m.chetan.kumar@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wojackbb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).