From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:49:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: realview: basic device tree implementation
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbH4WrMgmj+sdgx83KncV4iGTqvve_QisP14uuLP6XS2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1395826060-26662-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
 <26412341.aCOKep5CZC@wuerfel>
 <CACRpkdbH4WrMgmj+sdgx83KncV4iGTqvve_QisP14uuLP6XS2w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6858054.UjaoSyhELL@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thursday 08 May 2014 13:20:19 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> 
> > Catalin originally added the sparsemem hack. I asked him today about
> > it, and he also thinks that sparsemem without the hack should work,
> > as long as there is highmem support. I think we can either do away
> > with it entirely, or use the patch below to keep it alive.
> 
> IMO the patch make things worse. I'd just say we switch it to use highmem
> and get rid of the madness.
> 
> Anyone claiming to be running performance-critical loads on the PBX
> is either insane or a liar.

Ok, definitely fine with me.

	Arnd