From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
Cc: ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
corbet@lwn.net, glider@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
dvyukov@google.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, kaleshsingh@google.com,
21cnbao@gmail.com, david@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] kasan: hw_tags: Add option to tag only at allocation time
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:51:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69b316bf-7163-4040-8682-e3d200b7d7c6@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aiyhb2XwMMJE3st7@google.com>
On 13/06/26 5:46 am, Isaac Manjarres wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 04:44:22AM +0000, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Introduce a boot option to tag only at allocation time of the objects. This
>> reduces KASAN MTE overhead, the tradeoff being reduced ability of
>> catching bugs.
>>
>> Now, when a memory object will be freed, it will retain the random tag it
>> had at allocation time. This compromises on catching UAF bugs, till the
>> time the object is not reallocated, at which point it will have a new
>> random tag.
>>
>> Hence, not catching "use-after-free-before-reallocation" and not catching
>> "double-free" will be the compromise for reduced KASAN overhead.
>>
>> This is an RFC because we are not clear about the performance benefit.
>>
>> Android folks, please help with testing!
>>
>> ---
>> Applies on Linus master (9716c086c8e8).
>>
>> Dev Jain (2):
>> kasan: hw_tags: Use KASAN_PAGE_REDZONE for vmalloc redzoning
>> kasan: hw_tags: Add boot option to elide free time poisoning
>>
>> Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 4 +++
>> mm/kasan/hw_tags.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> mm/kasan/kasan.h | 23 +++++++++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>
> I tested out this series on one of our devices that has MTE support,
> and didn't see any functional issues.
Thanks for testing Isaac! Do you have the bandwidth to carry out some
performance tests? We want to see whether this patchset gets perf boost
on some HW.
>
> One thing I did notice though, and it's independent of this patch, is
> that the vmalloc_oob is failing, but that happens even if these patches
> aren't present.
>
> Thanks,
> Isaac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 4:44 [RFC PATCH 0/2] kasan: hw_tags: Add option to tag only at allocation time Dev Jain
2026-06-12 4:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] kasan: hw_tags: Use KASAN_PAGE_REDZONE for vmalloc redzoning Dev Jain
2026-06-12 4:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] kasan: hw_tags: Add boot option to elide free time poisoning Dev Jain
2026-06-13 0:23 ` Isaac Manjarres
2026-06-19 4:44 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-13 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] kasan: hw_tags: Add option to tag only at allocation time Isaac Manjarres
2026-06-22 4:21 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-06-13 6:06 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-19 4:46 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-18 13:35 ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-18 14:05 ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-19 13:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-06-22 12:56 ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-19 13:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-06-22 12:42 ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-22 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-06-18 13:48 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-06-19 5:17 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69b316bf-7163-4040-8682-e3d200b7d7c6@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox