From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/imx: parallel-display: Adjust bus_flags and bus_format handling
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:50:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a2e711d186e216f34c6cbd5b66f2a19@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114131751.26746-1-marex@denx.de>
On 2019-11-14 14:17, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The bus_flags and bus_format handling logic does not seem to cover
> all potential usecases. Specifically, this seems to fail with an
> "edt,etm0700g0edh6" display attached to an 24bit display interface,
> with interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24" set in DT.
>
> In this specific setup, the panel-simple.c driver entry for the display
> sets .bus_flags to non-zero value. However, as imxpd->bus_format is set
> from the DT property "interface-pix-fmt", imx_pd_encoder_atomic_check()
> will set imx_crtc_state->bus_flags = imxpd->bus_flags even though the
> imxpd->bus_flags is zero, while the di->bus_flags is correctly set by
> the panel-simple.c and non-zero. The result is incorrect flags being
> used for the display configuration and thus an image corruption.
> (Specifically, DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE is not propagated and thus
> the ipuv3 clocks pixels on the wrong edge).
>
> This patch fixes the problem by overriding the imx_crtc_state->bus_format
> from the imxpd->bus_format only if the DT property "interface-pix-fmt" is
> present or if the DI provides no formats. Similarly for bus_flags, which
> are set from imxpd->bus_flags only if the DI provides no formats.
So this basically prioritizes imxpd->bus_format over what the display
provides? Is this correct in all situations?
I was thinking that interface-pix-fmt is the legacy way to define the
bus format and it should be provided by the display nowadays.
However, I guess there is the case where you connect a 18-bit display to
a 24-bit bus (leaving some bits unconnected). Depending on how the
colors/bits are distributed one cannot use 18-bit mode on SoC side but
has to use 24-bit. So the bus format becomes a connection specific
property... I guess the interface-pix-fmt can serve that role.
--
Stefan
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c
> index 35518e5de356..92f00b12c068 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c
> @@ -113,13 +113,16 @@ static int imx_pd_encoder_atomic_check(struct
> drm_encoder *encoder,
> struct drm_display_info *di = &conn_state->connector->display_info;
> struct imx_parallel_display *imxpd = enc_to_imxpd(encoder);
>
> - if (!imxpd->bus_format && di->num_bus_formats) {
> - imx_crtc_state->bus_flags = di->bus_flags;
> + if (imxpd->bus_format || !di->num_bus_formats)
> + imx_crtc_state->bus_format = imxpd->bus_format;
> + else
> imx_crtc_state->bus_format = di->bus_formats[0];
> - } else {
> +
> + if (di->num_bus_formats)
> + imx_crtc_state->bus_flags = di->bus_flags;
> + else
> imx_crtc_state->bus_flags = imxpd->bus_flags;
> - imx_crtc_state->bus_format = imxpd->bus_format;
> - }
> +
> imx_crtc_state->di_hsync_pin = 2;
> imx_crtc_state->di_vsync_pin = 3;
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-14 13:17 [PATCH] drm/imx: parallel-display: Adjust bus_flags and bus_format handling Marek Vasut
2019-11-14 13:50 ` Stefan Agner [this message]
2020-01-21 21:22 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-09 10:50 ` Philipp Zabel
2020-03-09 19:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-09 19:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-09 19:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-09 20:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-09 20:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-09 20:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-09 20:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-10 8:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-09 20:03 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-09 20:15 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a2e711d186e216f34c6cbd5b66f2a19@agner.ch \
--to=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).