From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:28:47 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] omap2plus: Trivial build break fixes
In-Reply-To: <8762u4423o.fsf@ti.com>
References: <1294165576-15628-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
	<8762u4423o.fsf@ti.com>
Message-ID: <6a39d0124306a5ac6b567edca88f0671@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman at ti.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:08 AM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; tony at atomide.com; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] omap2plus: Trivial build break fixes
>
> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
>
> > These are trivial build fixes which I found while doing some
> > testing 'omap-for-linus' branch.
> >
> > The series is generated against the linux-omap 'omap-for-linus'
> branch
> > and boot tested on OMAP4430 SDP and OMAP3630 ZOOM.
>
> Minor nit in your git-send-email config.
>
> Can you add the following to your ~/.gitconfig, or update to newer
> git
> where this is now the default:
>
> [sendemail]
> 	chainreplyto = false
>
> This will make all patches a reply to PATCH 0 instead of to the
> previous
> patch.
>
Have tried this in v2 I posted but it didn't appear to be a
reply for PATCH 0.


May be I missed something.

Regards,
Santosh