From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B00C3DA4A for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 13:38:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Cc:To:From:Date: MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6FNRvRdqPMxYH148flW+90w5EFkoq4YHv2pLfv40G6o=; b=wtf4d706BP1wGWP6tQo3SNpReO 6OzFFo2T+GR/zY1Z/WLqTllrFPzO+Sd7JyKycT923WR5Q/iiLPEYvABt0WcUpj9mzQXvv/0acR9Xz jueQTiNzVepi4pgxYP8duqJDUh8u/MqolvChLTOrSMJ9trAwLbMXbWGDwR6d9MRtGxrRagKvybiJA 2h8sg7dS/jGWGda+q0LixoDTw47hBNvf4gTw6qSqpucMHGTkbSOJC2L73LtgOZ2qSdKVZW8OS9nSN lZJA8sf04VewCKBwcaZpQ85t/TSxDxF3kxknSEzDv43eEzNt9TjvvCCBwra8fxCvYLs83r6gfT/N8 wcEX+s3g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1saxv3-0000000FyJd-1RAU; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 13:38:37 +0000 Received: from fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.158]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1saxuV-0000000Fy7c-2KqX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 13:38:05 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1E61151B99; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 09:38:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Aug 2024 09:38:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1722865081; x=1722951481; bh=6FNRvRdqPMxYH148flW+90w5EFkoq4YHv2pLfv40G6o=; b= vmSbAT9XQ3YgIDeU7+AcK1Rv8NvIULbBFrL6GghxgXdjysQ/GllO/hKJ0MwiYu2v +ZqONJ2O2OT7fescPDDlFX/5Uarp9F3CQBUQxcMzU0HNzAlUz7cGIVvEtsLz2zUp 0aaWVHcjhCqe52171OS3soeLka4VIGC1Dn9nAPsSnLAiYRD6E3s3bTTIla7+IJwv kO3+tWzvndCBvDhTilVm9aXQgn7tbP8Dh+TDO2XdisssZ7afhgfIM60AfUS7tF8i +eYY76Tb3/F6WpN4Kk8LHejHOz+CdnJd7RzfLNyD0J+3+XLtl3CdpbTe+rbrxwCe XDPQzEKMcWTI/8+6ADHdVg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1722865081; x= 1722951481; bh=6FNRvRdqPMxYH148flW+90w5EFkoq4YHv2pLfv40G6o=; b=r nZi/E8P1oxPW2qYR8VlDqzWWqUlKFP1F3SXNsFS8rnbQBLVYmnIj8KkbQnsxP0RQ FBjKGP4pXls83tPtkLtCDm/iCbIu0D321oTqjp6UcpVB0DV+tOMK7GVePPB7z3bG ZyJ9CkxQPCPZ0H/K8O7k749LO/URep8ClsiF0PqFrgt5De9Drj4+/J0ljbMOoO2H z/QAVKot27GwrAxzHOwampqq+7MiDkvvOeuGyeJllP7ttHd0eXEXYuNJyXNfvQXQ JSex973Bx7ZKBZkZkixiimOOxAB0/MSU3We0aFS2/95yTf9/Fh7DbKbiS+uyfnre LW+M/SxrlFxOJ26mIzPag== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrkeeigdeikecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefoggffhffvvefkjghfufgtgfesthejredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepfdetrhhn ugcuuegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpefhtdfhvddtfeehudekteeggffghfejgeegteefgffgvedugeduveelvdekhfdv ieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrrh hnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedt X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id A09FCB6008D; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 09:38:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 15:37:03 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Tony Lindgren" Cc: "Aaro Koskinen" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Russell King" , "Linus Walleij" , "Richard Earnshaw" , "Richard Sandiford" , "Ramana Radhakrishnan" , "Nicolas Pitre" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Mark Brown" , "Kristoffer Ericson" , "Robert Jarzmik" , "Janusz Krzysztofik" , Linux-OMAP , "Nikita Shubin" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Lunn" , "Sebastian Hesselbarth" , "Gregory Clement" , "Jeremy J. Peper" , debian-arm@lists.debian.org, "Dmitry Torokhov" , "Alexandre Torgue" , "Ard Biesheuvel" , "Shawn Guo" Message-Id: <6aaefebc-c7b0-4b1e-a9ee-5621c3339bed@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20240805123003.GA5123@atomide.com> References: <2831c5a6-cfbf-4fe0-b51c-0396e5b0aeb7@app.fastmail.com> <20240731191332.GB47080@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <20240805123003.GA5123@atomide.com> Subject: Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240805_063803_902594_A29DFB31 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.66 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 5, 2024, at 14:30, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Arnd Bergmann [240805 07:58]: >> Thinking about this some more, I wonder if we should just >> change the Kconfig dependencies now (for 6.12, possibly backported) >> and forbid ARM1136r0, i.e. OMAP2 and i.MX31, from being enabled >> in combination with SMP. >> >> This would immediately prevent the bug you are seeing and >> allow the cleanups we've been wanting to do for a while, >> and it would avoid the larger-scale rework that I had >> planned (moving armv6 into an armv5 kernel). >> >> The main reason we didn't do this in the past was that it broke >> Tony's workflow of testing omap2plus_defconfig across all >> platforms, but I assume this all changed with the new group >> maintainership anyway. > > Yes please go ahead, no objection from me. > > Also related, the 2430 support could be dropped as AFAIK there > are no active users for it. It's similar to the 2420 support > that n8x0 use, and only 2420 support should be kept. I've taken a look at this, and my feeling is that we would not gain much dropping 2430 since it has very little unique hardware, except for a few files in mach-omap2 and drivers/clk. Keeping it around as long as 2420 seems to be less work overall, so I won't send patches to drop this one. If anyone else wants to remove it, please go ahead. While looking at 2430 support, I did notice that musb support got lost in the DT conversion, which you mentioned as being incomplete at the time. This does mean it's almost certainly not been used for over a decade with an upstream kernel. Arnd