Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Xilinx RPU subsystem bindings

[Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>]

On 6/2/22 8:14 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 12:05:09PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Thanks for reviews. Please find my comments below:
>>
>> On 6/1/22 11:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 04:43:05PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>>>> Xilinx ZynqMP platform has dual-core ARM Cortex R5 Realtime Processing
>>>> Unit(RPU) subsystem. This patch adds dt-bindings for RPU subsystem
>>>> (cluster).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>>     - Add maxItems to sram and memory-region property
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>> - Add constraints of the possible values of xlnx,cluster-mode property
>>>> - fix description of power-domains property for r5 core
>>>> - Remove reg, address-cells and size-cells properties as it is not required
>>>> - Fix description of mboxes property
>>>> - Add description of each memory-region and remove old .txt binding link
>>>>     reference in the description
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>     - Add memory-region, mboxes and mbox-names properties in example
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>     - None
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    .../bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml   | 129 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h |   6 +
>>>>    2 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..cbff1c201a89
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>> +---
>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml#
>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>> +
>>>> +title: Xilinx R5F processor subsystem
>>>> +
>>>> +maintainers:
>>>> +  - Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
>>>> +  - Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xilinx.com>
>>>> +
>>>> +description: |
>>>> +  The Xilinx platforms include a pair of Cortex-R5F processors (RPU) for
>>>> +  real-time processing based on the Cortex-R5F processor core from ARM.
>>>> +  The Cortex-R5F processor implements the Arm v7-R architecture and includes a
>>>> +  floating-point unit that implements the Arm VFPv3 instruction set.
>>>> +
>>>> +properties:
>>>> +  compatible:
>>>> +    const: xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss
>>>> +
>>>> +  xlnx,cluster-mode:
>>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>>> +    enum: [0, 1, 2]
>>>> +    description: |
>>>> +      The RPU MPCore can operate in split mode(Dual-processor performance), Safety
>>>> +      lock-step mode(Both RPU cores execute the same code in lock-step,
>>>> +      clock-for-clock) or Single CPU mode (RPU core 0 can be held in reset while
>>>> +      core 1 runs normally). The processor does not support dynamic configuration.
>>>> +      Switching between modes is only permitted immediately after a processor reset.
>>>> +      If set to  1 then lockstep mode and if 0 then split mode.
>>>> +      If set to  2 then single CPU mode. When not defined, default will be lockstep mode.
>>>> +
>>>> +patternProperties:
>>>> +  "^r5f-[a-f0-9]+$":
>>>> +    type: object
>>>> +    description: |
>>>> +      The RPU is located in the Low Power Domain of the Processor Subsystem.
>>>> +      Each processor includes separate L1 instruction and data caches and
>>>> +      tightly coupled memories (TCM). System memory is cacheable, but the TCM
>>>> +      memory space is non-cacheable.
>>>> +
>>>> +      Each RPU contains one 64KB memory and two 32KB memories that
>>>> +      are accessed via the TCM A and B port interfaces, for a total of 128KB
>>>> +      per processor. In lock-step mode, the processor has access to 256KB of
>>>> +      TCM memory.
>>>> +
>>>> +    properties:
>>>> +      compatible:
>>>> +        const: xlnx,zynqmp-r5f
>>>> +
>>>> +      power-domains:
>>>> +        description: RPU core PM domain specifier
>>>> +        maxItems: 1
>>>> +
>>>> +      mboxes:
>>>> +        minItems: 1
>>>> +        items:
>>>> +          - description: mailbox channel to send data to RPU
>>>> +          - description: mailbox channel to receive data from RPU
>>>> +
>>>> +      mbox-names:
>>>> +        minItems: 1
>>>> +        items:
>>>> +          - const: tx
>>>> +          - const: rx
>>>> +
>>>> +      sram:
>>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>>>> +        maxItems: 8
>>> minItems: 1
>>> maxItems: 8
>>> items:
>>>     maxItems: 1
>> I have posted v7 which adds "minItems: 1".
>>
>> However, I didn't get items: part. Is it required to have items: now?
> Yes.
>> Can I add items: part once TCM bindings are posted?
> No.
>
>> I understand that minItems and maxItems under sram property decides how many
>> phandles sram can have.
>>
>> However, maxItems: 1 under items: field what it describes?
> 'phandle-array' is really a matrix type because we can have phandles
> plus argument cells. So you have to define each of the 1-8 entries is a
> single phandle cell (and no arg cells).

Thanks for explanation. I will send new revision as suggested.

>
> Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel