From: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_sdei: remove unused interfaces
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 10:08:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d0adc02-bcd8-2217-c145-d609528fbe77@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c127e49-b1c6-c7ac-69bf-9fc0a6dba4c4@arm.com>
Hi James,
On 2020/5/5 1:14, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> (CC: +Xiongfeng)
>
> Thanks for the reminder - I was just searching for who was using this.
Thanks for CC me. We do have a driver that are using it.
>
> On 04/05/2020 17:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> The export symbols to register/unregister and enable/disable events
>> aren't ever used outside of arm_sdei.c, so mark them static.
>
> Xiongfeng, you have drivers using this, could they be posted upstream. Or can we stop
> exporting these?
It's the SDEI Wathchdog which is used for hardlockup detection. But I wasn't
able to push it upstream because we have Pseudo-NMI in mainline.
>
>
> (they were originally added for the GHES RAS thing, but by the time it was all merged
> upstream, it wasn't possible to build it as a module)
The SDEI Watchdog driver also can't be built as a module. We still need to
modify the origin kernel. So I think this patch doesn't affect me. Thanks for CC me.
Thanks,
Xiongfeng
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
>> index 334c8be0c11fb..bdd6461647d74 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
>> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static void _local_event_enable(void *data)
>> sdei_cross_call_return(arg, err);
>> }
>>
>> -int sdei_event_enable(u32 event_num)
>> +static int sdei_event_enable(u32 event_num)
>> {
>> int err = -EINVAL;
>> struct sdei_event *event;
>> @@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ int sdei_event_enable(u32 event_num)
>>
>> return err;
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdei_event_enable);
>>
>> static int sdei_api_event_disable(u32 event_num)
>> {
>> @@ -447,7 +446,7 @@ static void _ipi_event_disable(void *data)
>> sdei_cross_call_return(arg, err);
>> }
>>
>> -int sdei_event_disable(u32 event_num)
>> +static int sdei_event_disable(u32 event_num)
>> {
>> int err = -EINVAL;
>> struct sdei_event *event;
>> @@ -471,7 +470,6 @@ int sdei_event_disable(u32 event_num)
>>
>> return err;
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdei_event_disable);
>>
>> static int sdei_api_event_unregister(u32 event_num)
>> {
>> @@ -502,7 +500,7 @@ static int _sdei_event_unregister(struct sdei_event *event)
>> return sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_unregister, event);
>> }
>>
>> -int sdei_event_unregister(u32 event_num)
>> +static int sdei_event_unregister(u32 event_num)
>> {
>> int err;
>> struct sdei_event *event;
>> @@ -533,7 +531,6 @@ int sdei_event_unregister(u32 event_num)
>>
>> return err;
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdei_event_unregister);
>>
>> /*
>> * unregister events, but don't destroy them as they are re-registered by
>> @@ -603,7 +600,8 @@ static int _sdei_event_register(struct sdei_event *event)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> -int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
>> +static int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb,
>> + void *arg)
>> {
>> int err;
>> struct sdei_event *event;
>> @@ -643,7 +641,6 @@ int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
>>
>> return err;
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdei_event_register);
>>
>> static int sdei_reregister_event_llocked(struct sdei_event *event)
>> {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
>> index 0a241c5c911d8..5f9fb1d95d515 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
>> @@ -22,21 +22,6 @@
>> */
>> typedef int (sdei_event_callback)(u32 event, struct pt_regs *regs, void *arg);
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Register your callback to claim an event. The event must be described
>> - * by firmware.
>> - */
>> -int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg);
>> -
>> -/*
>> - * Calls to sdei_event_unregister() may return EINPROGRESS. Keep calling
>> - * it until it succeeds.
>> - */
>> -int sdei_event_unregister(u32 event_num);
>> -
>> -int sdei_event_enable(u32 event_num);
>> -int sdei_event_disable(u32 event_num);
>> -
>> /* GHES register/unregister helpers */
>> int sdei_register_ghes(struct ghes *ghes, sdei_event_callback *normal_cb,
>> sdei_event_callback *critical_cb);
>>
>
>
> .
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-05 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 16:42 [PATCH] firmware: arm_sdei: remove unused interfaces Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04 17:14 ` James Morse
2020-05-05 2:08 ` Xiongfeng Wang [this message]
2020-05-19 15:47 ` James Morse
2020-05-20 3:06 ` Xiongfeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d0adc02-bcd8-2217-c145-d609528fbe77@huawei.com \
--to=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox