From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: Acknowledge completion queue on each iteration
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:46:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d10032c-35ec-978c-6b8f-1ab9c07adf7f@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170717224551.GA1496@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Keith,
On 7/17/2017 6:45 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:36:23PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Code is moving the completion queue doorbell after processing all completed
>> events and sending callbacks to the block layer on each iteration.
>>
>> This is causing a performance drop when a lot of jobs are queued towards
>> the HW. Move the completion queue doorbell on each loop instead and allow new
>> jobs to be queued by the HW.
>
> That doesn't make sense. Aggregating doorbell writes should be much more
> efficient for high depth workloads.
>
Problem is that code is throttling the HW as HW cannot queue more completions until
SW get a chance to clear it.
As an example:
for each in N
(
blk_layer()
)
ring door bell
HW cannot queue new job until N x blk_layer operations are processed and queue
element ownership is passed to the HW after the loop. HW is just sitting idle
there if no queue entries are available.
Sinan
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 22:36 [PATCH] nvme: Acknowledge completion queue on each iteration Sinan Kaya
2017-07-17 22:45 ` Keith Busch
2017-07-17 22:46 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2017-07-17 22:56 ` Keith Busch
2017-07-17 23:07 ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2017-07-18 14:36 ` Keith Busch
2017-07-18 18:52 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-07-18 21:26 ` Keith Busch
2017-07-19 9:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-19 10:37 ` Sinan Kaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d10032c-35ec-978c-6b8f-1ab9c07adf7f@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).