linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: Acknowledge completion queue on each iteration
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:46:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d10032c-35ec-978c-6b8f-1ab9c07adf7f@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170717224551.GA1496@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Keith,

On 7/17/2017 6:45 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:36:23PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Code is moving the completion queue doorbell after processing all completed
>> events and sending callbacks to the block layer on each iteration.
>>
>> This is causing a performance drop when a lot of jobs are queued towards
>> the HW. Move the completion queue doorbell on each loop instead and allow new
>> jobs to be queued by the HW.
> 
> That doesn't make sense. Aggregating doorbell writes should be much more
> efficient for high depth workloads.
> 

Problem is that code is throttling the HW as HW cannot queue more completions until
SW get a chance to clear it. 

As an example:

for each in N
(
	blk_layer()
)
ring door bell

HW cannot queue new job until N x blk_layer operations are processed and queue
element ownership is passed to the HW after the loop. HW is just sitting idle
there if no queue entries are available.

Sinan

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-17 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-17 22:36 [PATCH] nvme: Acknowledge completion queue on each iteration Sinan Kaya
2017-07-17 22:45 ` Keith Busch
2017-07-17 22:46   ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2017-07-17 22:56     ` Keith Busch
2017-07-17 23:07       ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2017-07-18 14:36         ` Keith Busch
2017-07-18 18:52           ` Sinan Kaya
2017-07-18 21:26             ` Keith Busch
2017-07-19  9:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-19 10:37   ` Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6d10032c-35ec-978c-6b8f-1ab9c07adf7f@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).